Feasibility of atmospheric methane removal using methanotrophic biotrickling filters

被引:49
作者
Yoon, Sukhwan [1 ]
Carey, Jeffrey N. [1 ]
Semrau, Jeremy D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Methane; Methanotroph; Biofilm; Biofiltration; Biotrickling filter; II METHANOTROPH; WASTE-GAS; OXIDATION; BIOFILTRATION; MONOOXYGENASE; DEGRADATION; EMISSION; BACTERIA; SOILS; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00253-009-1977-9
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Methane is a potent greenhouse gas with a global warming potential similar to 23 times that of carbon dioxide. Here, we describe the modeling of a biotrickling filtration system composed of methane-consuming bacteria, i.e., methanotrophs, to assess the utility of these systems in removing methane from the atmosphere. Model results indicate that assuming the global average atmospheric concentration of methane, 1.7 ppmv, methane removal is ineffective using these methanotrophic biofilters as the methane concentration is too low to enable cell survival. If the concentration is increased to 500-6,000 ppmv, however, similar to that found above landfills and in concentrated animal feeding operations (factory farms), 4.98-35.7 tons of methane can be removed per biofilter per year assuming biotrickling filters of typical size (3.66 m in diameter and 11.5 m in height). Using reported ranges of capital, operational, and maintenance costs, the cost of the equivalent ton of CO2 removal using these systems is $90-$910 ($2,070-$20,900 per ton of methane), depending on the influent concentration of methane and if heating is required. The use of methanotrophic biofilters for controlling methane emissions is technically feasible and, provided that either the costs of biofilter construction and operation are reduced or the value of CO2 credits is increased, can also be economically attractive.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 956
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Biofiltration for the treatment of complex mixtures of VOC - Influence of the packing material [J].
Aizpuru, A ;
Khammar, N ;
Malhautier, L ;
Fanlo, JL .
ACTA BIOTECHNOLOGICA, 2003, 23 (2-3) :211-226
[2]  
Alonso C, 1997, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V54, P583, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19970620)54:6<583::AID-BIT9>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-F
[4]  
Amaral JA, 1998, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V64, P2397
[5]   Modelling the growth of a methanotrophic biofilm: Estimation of parameters and variability [J].
Arcangeli, JP ;
Arvin, E .
BIODEGRADATION, 1999, 10 (03) :177-191
[6]   Natural and anthropogenic methane sources in New England [J].
Blaha, D ;
Bartlett, K ;
Czepiel, P ;
Harriss, R ;
Crill, P .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (02) :243-255
[7]   Methane oxidation in landfill cover soils, as revealed by potential oxidation measurements and phospholipid fatty acid analyses [J].
Borjesson, G ;
Sundh, I ;
Tunlid, A ;
Svensson, BH .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1998, 30 (10-11) :1423-1433
[8]   Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability [J].
Bousquet, P. ;
Ciais, P. ;
Miller, J. B. ;
Dlugokencky, E. J. ;
Hauglustaine, D. A. ;
Prigent, C. ;
Van der Werf, G. R. ;
Peylin, P. ;
Brunke, E. -G. ;
Carouge, C. ;
Langenfelds, R. L. ;
Lathiere, J. ;
Papa, F. ;
Ramonet, M. ;
Schmidt, M. ;
Steele, L. P. ;
Tyler, S. C. ;
White, J. .
NATURE, 2006, 443 (7110) :439-443
[9]   Detection and classification of atmospheric methane oxidizing bacteria in soil [J].
Bull, ID ;
Parekh, NR ;
Hall, GH ;
Ineson, P ;
Evershed, RP .
NATURE, 2000, 405 (6783) :175-178
[10]  
Carman RE, 1998, ENVIRON ENG GEOSCI, V4, P317