ON THE PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT RANS BASED MODELS TO DESCRIBE THE TURBULENT FLOW IN AN AGITATED VESSEL USING NON-STRUCTURED GRIDS AND PIV VALIDATION

被引:8
作者
Alonzo-Garcia, Alejandro [1 ]
Mendoza-Escamilla, Victor X. [2 ]
Martinez-Delgadillo, Sergio A. [3 ]
Gonzalez-Neria, Israel [3 ]
Gutierrez-Torres, Claudia del C. [4 ]
Jimenez-Bernal, Jose A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ingn & Desarrollo Ind, Queretaro, Mexico
[2] Univ Autonoma Metropolitana Azcapotzalco, Dept Elect, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Univ Autonoma Metropolitana Azcapotzalco, Dept Ciencias Basicas, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[4] Inst Politecn Nacl, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
关键词
Agitated tank; Pitched blade turbine; Cut-Cell; RANS; Tetrahedral cells; PIV; PITCHED BLADE TURBINE; CFD SIMULATION; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; STIRRED TANKS; IMPELLER; LES; STANDARD; EPSILON; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1590/0104-6632.20190361s20180091
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The performances of the Standard kappa-epsilon, RNG, Realizable. kappa-omega and RSM turbulence models to describe the behavior of the flow in agitated tank reactors were evaluated. Because most of these tanks have complex geometries, structured meshing schemes arc not a practical alternative in engineering. Two particular unstructured meshing schemes composed of either Cartesian Cut-Cell (CC) or Tetrahedral elements were tested in domains larger than 3 million cells. In this work, the blade thickness, which is usually disregarded, was accounted for. The performance of the turbulence models was validated by PIV measurements. A strong dependence on the grid size and the power number was found, with CC grids having good agreement with grids > 3.6 Million. The pumping number was independent of the cell number and the values agree with experimental data. The Realizable model resolved with a tetrahedral grid presented the overall best performance.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 382
页数:22
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   A 3D CFD simulation of a self inducing Pitched Blade Turbine Downflow [J].
Achouri, Ryma ;
Mokni, Ines ;
Mhiri, Hatem ;
Bournot, Philippe .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 64 :633-641
[2]   Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow in an unbaffled stirred tank driven by a Rushton turbine [J].
Alcamo, R ;
Micale, G ;
Grisafi, F ;
Brucato, A ;
Ciofalo, M .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2005, 60 (8-9) :2303-2316
[3]  
Andersson B., 2011, COMPUTATIONAL FLUID
[4]  
Ansys, 2009, US GUID
[5]   Modeling turbulent flow in stirred tanks with CFD: the influence of the modeling approach, turbulence model and numerical scheme [J].
Aubin, J ;
Fletcher, DF ;
Xuereb, C .
EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE, 2004, 28 (05) :431-445
[6]   Effect of axial agitator configuration (up-pumping, down-pumping, reverse rotation) on flow patterns generated in stirred vessels [J].
Aubin, J ;
Mavros, P ;
Fletcher, DF ;
Bertrand, J ;
Xuereb, C .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2001, 79 (A8) :845-856
[7]  
Bhattacharya S., 2008, CAN J CHEM ENG, V80, P1, DOI [10.1002/cjce.5450800405, DOI 10.1002/CJCE.5450800405]
[8]   The effect of impeller and tank geometry on power number for a pitched blade turbine [J].
Chapple, D ;
Kresta, SM ;
Wall, A ;
Afacan, A .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2002, 80 (A4) :364-372
[9]   CFD prediction of fluid flow and mixing in stirred tanks: Numerical issues about the RANS simulations [J].
Coroneo, M. ;
Montante, G. ;
Paglianti, A. ;
Magelli, F. .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 35 (10) :1959-1968
[10]   LES and URANS simulations of hydrodynamics in mixing tank: Comparison to PIV experiments [J].
Delafosse, Angelique ;
Line, Alain ;
Morchain, Jerome ;
Guiraud, Pascal .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2008, 86 (12A) :1322-1330