Analysis of the Error in Retrievals of Aerosol Optical Properties from Sunphotometer Measurements of CARSNET Due to a Variety of Objective Factors

被引:9
|
作者
Gui, Ke [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Che, Huizheng [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Quanliang [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Jie [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zheng, Yu [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lu, Sai [6 ]
Wang, Hong [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Yaqiang [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Xiaoye [3 ,4 ]
Shi, Guangyu [7 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Informat Technol, Coll Atmospher Sci, Chengdu 610225, Peoples R China
[2] Plateau Atmospher & Environm Lab Sichuan Prov, Chengdu 610225, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, State Key Lab Severe Weather LASW, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, Inst Atmospher Composit, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, China Meteorol Adm, Key Lab Aerosol Cloud Precipitat, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[6] China Meteorol Adm, Meteorol Observat Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[7] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, State Key Lab Numer Modeling Atmospher Sci & Geop, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CE318; sunphotometer; aerosol optical depth (AOD); angstrom ngstrom exponent; retrieval error; CLIMATE; NETWORK; CHINA; AERONET; ATMOSPHERE; DEPTH; URBAN; SUN;
D O I
10.3390/atmos7010009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In situ observation of the aerosol optical properties is important to the validations of satellite and modeling results; however, the operational measurements can be affected by some objective factors. An experiment study has been performed in order to analyze the error in retrievals of aerosol optical properties from sunphotometer measurements caused by a variety of in situ objective factors. The standard instrument relative error analysis method was used to determine the relative error of aerosol optical depth (AOD) and angstrom ngstrom exponent (AE) under the effects of five factors: spider web inside the collimator (F1); collimator bending (F2); dust inside the optical head (F3); incrustation scale inside the optical head (F4); and dust and incrustation scale inside the optical head (F5). The results showed that the five factors caused error for AOD retrieved at 1020, 870, 670 and 440 nm, with the maximum error occurring at 870 nm due to the more sensitive measurement signals. The error ranges of AOD derived from the direct solar measurements in the four bands were -0.34%-8.77%, -6.22%-9.68%, -0.05%-2.52%, -0.96%-3.48% and 5.42%-13.38% for F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5, respectively. The maximum error occurred under the influence of F5 with an average error value of 10%, while the minimum occurred owing to F3 with an average error value of 1%. All of the AEs retrieved from the experimental instruments were smaller than that from the reference instrument. The AE error values were 15.19%, 25.57%, 4.56%, 4.41% and 8.83% for F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5, respectively. The average AE retrieval error value was 11.7%.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Maritime Aerosol Network optical depth measurements and comparison with satellite retrievals from various different sensors
    Smirnov, Alexander
    Petrenko, Maksym
    Ichoku, Charles
    Holben, Brent N.
    REMOTE SENSING OF CLOUDS AND THE ATMOSPHERE XXII, 2017, 10424
  • [22] Source characterization from ambient measurements of aerosol optical properties
    Cappa, Christopher D.
    Bates, Timothy S.
    Quinn, Patricia K.
    Lack, Daniel A.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 36
  • [23] Aerosol Optical Properties Retrieval from Surface Radiation Measurements
    Kosmopoulos, G.
    Kazantzidis, A.
    PERSPECTIVES ON ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2017, : 775 - 780
  • [24] Theoretical evaluation of errors in aerosol optical depth retrievals from ground-based direct-sun measurements due to circumsolar and related effects
    Kocifaj, Miroslav
    Gueymard, Christian A.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 45 (04) : 1050 - 1058
  • [25] Investigation of Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) and Angstrom Exponent over the Desert Region of Northwestern China Based on Measurements from the China Aerosol Remote Sensing Network (CARSNET)
    Yu, Jie
    Che, Huizheng
    Chen, Quanliang
    Xia, Xiangao
    Zhao, Hujia
    Wang, Hong
    Wang, Yaqiang
    Zhang, Xiaoye
    Shi, Guangyu
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2015, 15 (05) : 2024 - 2036
  • [26] Constrained Retrievals of Aerosol Optical Properties Using Combined Lidar and Imager Measurements During the FIREX-AQ Campaign
    Midzak, Natalie
    Yorks, John
    Zhang, Jianglong
    Limbacher, James
    Garay, Michael
    Kalashnikova, Olga
    FRONTIERS IN REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 3
  • [27] AERONET Remotely Sensed Measurements and Retrievals of Biomass Burning Aerosol Optical Properties During the 2015 Indonesian Burning Season
    Eck, T. F.
    Holben, B. N.
    Giles, D. M.
    Slutsker, I
    Sinyuk, A.
    Schafer, J. S.
    Smirnov, A.
    Sorokin, M.
    Reid, J. S.
    Sayer, A. M.
    Hsu, N. C.
    Shi, Y. R.
    Levy, R. C.
    Lyapustin, A.
    Rahman, Muhammad Arif
    Liew, Soo-Chin
    Cortijo, Santo V. Salinas
    Li, Tan
    Kalbermatter, Daniel
    Keong, Kwoh Leong
    Yuggotomo, Muhammad Elifant
    Aditya, Fanni
    Mohamad, Maznorizan
    Mahmud, Mastura
    Chong, Tan Kok
    Lim, Hwee-San
    Choon, Yeap Eng
    Deranadyan, Gumilang
    Kusumaningtyas, Sheila D. A.
    Aldrian, Edvin
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2019, 124 (08) : 4722 - 4740
  • [28] Trend analysis of the aerosol optical depth from fusion of MISR and MODIS retrievals over China
    Guo, Jing
    Gu, Xingfa
    Yu, Tao
    Cheng, Tianhai
    Chen, Hao
    35TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT (ISRSE35), 2014, 17
  • [29] Analysis of Long-Term Aerosol Optical Properties Combining AERONET Sunphotometer and Satellite-Based Observations in Hong Kong
    Yu, Xinyu
    Nichol, Janet
    Lee, Kwon Ho
    Li, Jing
    Wong, Man Sing
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [30] Recent trends in aerosol optical properties derived from AERONET measurements
    Li, J.
    Carlson, B. E.
    Dubovik, O.
    Lacis, A. A.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2014, 14 (22) : 12271 - 12289