The radiation dose tolerance of the brachial plexus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:44
作者
Yan, Michael [1 ]
Kong, Weidong [2 ]
Kerr, Andrew [3 ]
Brundage, Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Canc Ctr Southeastern Ontario, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Canc Res Inst, Div Canc Care & Epidemiol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] Canc Ctr Southeastern Ontario, Dept Med Phys, Kingston, ON, Canada
关键词
Brachial plexus; Radiation induced brachial plexopathy; Normal tissue constraints; Radiotherapy; CELL LUNG-CANCER; POST-IRRADIATION LESIONS; BREAST-CANCER; DOSIMETRIC ANALYSIS; EARLY-STAGE; FOLLOW-UP; PLEXOPATHY; THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctro.2019.06.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the incidence of radiation induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) and the associated radiotherapy doses to this structure. Methods: Databases were queried without language restriction for cohort studies reporting RIBP incidence and associated brachial plexus dose maximum dose (bpDmax). Studies specifying RIBP relative risk (RR) effect size were selected for meta-analysis. RRs for RIBP from each study were converted to a regression coefficient (beta) and standard error corresponding to a continuous representation of bpDmax. The adjusted beta from individual studies were combined using a random effects model and weighted by inverse variance (1/SE2). The trim and fill approach was used to assess publication bias. Results: We identified 25 studies that included 37 unique patient cohorts eligible for analysis. Seventeen cohorts experienced an RIBP incidence <= 5%, of which 6 cohorts exceeded conventional plexus constraints of 60 Gy for bpDmax. Five of the 6 cohorts were simulated with 3D-CT techniques. Meta-analysis of eligible studies demonstrated a significant increase in RIBP risk for each Gy increase in bpDmax (RR, 1.11; 95% CI 1.07-1.15). Results remained significant after adjustment for publication bias and when sensitivity analysis was performed. Conclusions: Our results suggest that current brachial plexus constraints of 60-66 Gy are safe. Meta-analysis provides a log-linear model to quantify the association of brachial plexus dose and RIBP risk, and thus inform the therapeutic ratio for dose escalation. Further prospective studies reporting dosimetric data can better refine this model and inform brachial plexus constraint guidelines. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 31
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Dose Constraints to Prevent Radiation-Induced Brachial Plexopathy in Patients Treated for Lung Cancer [J].
Amini, Arya ;
Yang, Jinzhong ;
Williamson, Ryan ;
McBurney, Michelle L. ;
Erasmus, Jeremy, Jr. ;
Allen, Pamela K. ;
Karhade, Mandar ;
Komaki, Ritsuko ;
Liao, Zhongxing ;
Gomez, Daniel ;
Cox, James ;
Dong, Lei ;
Welsh, James .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (03) :E391-E398
[2]   Randomized Phase III Trial of Concurrent Accelerated Radiation Plus Cisplatin With or Without Cetuximab for Stage III to IV Head and Neck Carcinoma: RTOG 0522 [J].
Ang, K. Kian ;
Zhang, Qiang ;
Rosenthal, David I. ;
Nguyen-Tan, Phuc Felix ;
Sherman, Eric J. ;
Weber, Randal S. ;
Galvin, James M. ;
Bonner, James A. ;
Harris, Jonathan ;
El-Naggar, Adel K. ;
Gillison, Maura L. ;
Jordan, Richard C. ;
Konski, Andre A. ;
Thorstad, Wade L. ;
Trotti, Andy ;
Beitler, Jonathan J. ;
Garden, Adam S. ;
Spanos, William J. ;
Yom, Sue S. ;
Axelrod, Rita S. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (27) :2940-+
[3]  
[Anonymous], RISK POSTOPERATIVE A
[4]  
[Anonymous], BASIC CLIN RADIOBIOL
[5]  
[Anonymous], EUR J CANC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, J. Nucl. Med. Radiat. Ther, DOI DOI 10.4172/2155-9619.1000168
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, REP RADIOTHER ONCOL, DOI DOI 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90171-Y
[8]  
[Anonymous], RTOG 0615 PROTOCOL R
[9]  
[Anonymous], J NERV MENT DIS
[10]   Is there a life-long risk of brachial plexopathy after radiotherapy of supraclavicular lymph nodes in breast cancer patients? [J].
Bajrovic, A ;
Rades, D ;
Fehlauer, F ;
Tribius, S ;
Hoeller, U ;
Rudat, V ;
Jung, H ;
Alberti, W .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 71 (03) :297-301