How employment support and social integration programmes are viewed by the intellectually disabled

被引:39
作者
Cramm, J. M. [1 ]
Finkenfugel, H. [1 ]
Kuijsten, R. [1 ]
van Exel, N. J. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Inst Hlth Policy & Management iBMG, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
intellectual disability; Q-methodology; self-development; social integration; supported employment; Q-METHODOLOGY; LIFE-STYLE; ATTITUDES; UNDERSTANDINGS; PEOPLE; HEALTH; WELL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01168.x
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Supported employment is intended to facilitate and promote participation and integration of intellectually disabled citizens in society. This study investigated their view of the programme. Q-methodology was used. Eighteen respondents with a mild intellectual disability rank-ordered 22 statements representing five main aspects of supported employment. The data were factor-analysed to group respondents according to their views. Q-methodology was a feasible approach that facilitated in-depth conversations with respondents with a mild intellectual disability in a playful manner. Two views on the impact of supported employment on social integration were observed: 'work as participation' and 'work as structure'. The first placed greater value on participation, task variety, belonging, and feeling appreciated; the second placed greater value on working independently, clear working agreements, and friendly co-workers. The views indicate two distinct approaches to effecting a positive relationship between supported employment and social integration. From the perspective of people with an intellectual disability supported employment contributes to self-development and has a positive effect on well-being, albeit in different ways for the individual groups.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 520
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SOCIAL INDICATORS RE, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-010-0271-4_10
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1970, MOTIVATION PERSONALI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, POLITICAL SUBJECTIVI
[4]   Economic rationality and health and lifestyle choices for people with diabetes [J].
Baker, Rachel Mairi .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (09) :2341-2353
[5]  
BROWNE RB, 1993, J AM CULTURE, V16, P91
[6]   Understandings of Down's syndrome: A Q methodological investigation [J].
Bryant, Louise D. ;
Green, Josephine M. ;
Hewison, Jenny .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (05) :1188-1200
[7]  
ChadseyRusch J, 1997, AM J MENT RETARD, V102, P1, DOI 10.1352/0895-8017(1997)102<0001:BASIFT>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]  
COENENHANEGRAAF M, 1998, BEGELEID WERKEN THEO
[10]   Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology [J].
Cross, RM .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2005, 20 (02) :206-213