How female x male and male x male interactions influence competitive fertilization in Drosophila melanogaster

被引:37
作者
Luepold, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
Reil, Jonathan Bradley [3 ,4 ]
Manier, Mollie K. [2 ,5 ]
Zeender, Valerian [1 ]
Belote, John M. [2 ]
Pitnick, Scott [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Evolutionary Biol & Environm Studies, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Syracuse Univ, Dept Biol, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Entomol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[4] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Plant & Environm Protect Sci, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[5] George Washington Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Washington, DC 20052 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cryptic female choice; ejaculate-female interactions; female reproductive tract; genetic compatibility; postcopulatory sexual selection; sperm competition; trait diversification; NATURAL GENETIC-VARIATION; SPERM COMPETITION; COPULATION DURATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; OVARIAN FLUID; SEMINAL FLUID; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; MODEL SELECTION; EJACULATE SIZE; MATE CHOICE;
D O I
10.1002/evl3.193
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
How males and females contribute to joint reproductive success has been a long-standing question in sexual selection. Under postcopulatory sexual selection, paternity success is predicted to derive from complex interactions among females engaging in cryptic female choice and males engaging in sperm competition. Such interactions have been identified as potential sources of genetic variation in sexually selected traits but are also expected to inhibit trait diversification. To date, studies of interactions between females and competing males have focused almost exclusively on genotypes and not phenotypic variation in sexually selected traits. Here, we characterize within- and between-sex interactions inDrosophila melanogasterusing isogenic lines with heritable variation in both male and female traits known to influence competitive fertilization. We confirmed, and expanded on, previously reported genotypic interactions within and between the sexes, and showed that several reproductive events, including sperm transfer, female sperm ejection, and sperm storage, were explained by two- and three-way interactions among sex-specific phenotypes. We also documented complex interactions between the lengths of competing males' sperm and the female seminal receptacle, which are known to have experienced rapid female-male co-diversification. Our results highlight the nonindependence of sperm competition and cryptic female choice and demonstrate that complex interactions between the sexes do not limit the ability of multivariate systems to respond to directional sexual selection.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 429
页数:14
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   Multiple mechanisms of cryptic female choice act on intraspecific male variation in Drosophila simulans [J].
Ala-Honkola, Outi ;
Manier, Mollie K. .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2016, 70 (04) :519-532
[2]   Inbreeding reveals mode of past selection on male reproductive characters in Drosophila melanogaster [J].
Ala-Honkola, Outi ;
Hosken, David J. ;
Manier, Mollie K. ;
Luepold, Stefan ;
Droge-Young, Elizabeth M. ;
Berben, Kirstin S. ;
Collins, William F. ;
Belote, John M. ;
Pitnick, Scott .
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2013, 3 (07) :2089-2102
[3]   Ovarian fluid allows directional cryptic female choice despite external fertilization [J].
Alonzo, Suzanne H. ;
Stiver, Kelly A. ;
Marsh-Rollo, Susan E. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 7
[4]  
Andersson Malte, 1994
[5]  
Arnqvist G, 2014, EVOLUTION OF INSECT MATING SYSTEMS, P204
[6]  
Arnqvist Goran, 2005, pUnpaginated
[7]   Insect Seminal Fluid Proteins: Identification and Function [J].
Avila, Frank W. ;
Sirot, Laura K. ;
LaFlamme, Brooke A. ;
Rubinstein, C. Dustin ;
Wolfner, Mariana F. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, VOL 56, 2011, 56 :21-40
[8]  
Barton K., 2017, Multi-model inference
[9]   Cryptic female choice: Criteria for establishing female sperm choice [J].
Birkhead, TR .
EVOLUTION, 1998, 52 (04) :1212-1218
[10]   Nontransitivity of paternity in a bird [J].
Birkhead, TR ;
Chaline, N ;
Biggins, JD ;
Burke, T ;
Pizzari, T .
EVOLUTION, 2004, 58 (02) :416-420