The Environment, Energy and Economic Impacts of Carbon Tax and Indirect Tax in the Coal Industry

被引:2
作者
Wang, Jingmin [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Chen [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Baoding, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES | 2019年 / 28卷 / 05期
关键词
computable general equilibrium (CGE) model; CO2; taxation; coal industry; China; carbon tax; EMISSION TRADING SCHEME; CO2; EMISSIONS; POWER-PLANTS; RESOURCE TAX; CHINA; CONSUMPTION; PROVINCE; POLICIES; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.15244/pjoes/96256
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The CO2 emissions from China's coal consumption account for 14.3% of the world's CO2 emissions. The taxation of China's coal industry affects the progress of world emissions reduction to some extent. This paper establishes six countermeasure scenarios with different tax systems considering carbon tax and indirect tax, then constructs a dynamic recursive computable general equilibrium model to simulate the tax system changes of the coal industry. It turns out that in both rural and urban populations, coal consumption is more sensitive to the carbon tax and indirect tax compared with the consumption of other commodities. The reduction effect of increasing tax will grow and social reduction cost will be reduced over time. Increasing the coal industry tax can reduce CO2 emissions significantly and will suffer relatively less GDP loss, for example increasing 20% of indirect tax on the coal industry will lead to 3.65 billion tons of CO2 reduction during 2018-2030, accounting for 10.05% of 2015 world CO2 emissions. We found that increasing taxes can improve all industries' energy efficiency, which reflects on the powerful role of the coal industry in guiding the market to reducing CO2 emissions. Finally, these results strongly recommend that China should increase indirect tax as quickly as possible to reach the long-term interests as soon as possible.
引用
收藏
页码:3887 / 3899
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The inequality impacts of the carbon tax in China
    Chen, Shuyang
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [22] THE EMISSIONS REDUCTION EFFECT AND ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AN ENERGY TAX VS. A CARBON TAX IN CHINA: A DYNAMIC CGE MODEL ANALYSIS
    Zou, Lele
    Xue, Jinjun
    Fox, Alan
    Meng, Bo
    SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 63 (02) : 339 - 387
  • [23] The impacts of carbon tax and complementary policies on Chinese economy
    Lu, Chuanyi
    Tong, Qing
    Liu, Xuemei
    ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (11) : 7278 - 7285
  • [24] The Urbanisation Impacts on the Policy Effects of the Carbon Tax in China
    Chen, Shuyang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [25] Does a carbon tax make sense in countries with still a high potential for energy efficiency? Comparison between the reducing-emissions effects of carbon tax and energy efficiency measures in the Chilean case
    Vera, Sonia
    Sauma, Enzo
    ENERGY, 2015, 88 : 478 - 488
  • [26] The Impact of Energy Tax on Carbon Emission Mitigation: An Integrated Analysis Using CGE and SDA
    Li, Hong
    Wang, Jing
    Wang, Shuai
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [27] A comparative study on the environmental and economic effects of a resource tax and carbon tax in China: Analysis based on the computable general equilibrium model
    Hu, Haisheng
    Dong, Wanhao
    Zhou, Qian
    ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 156
  • [28] On the impacts of carbon tax and technological progress on China
    Dong, Baomin
    Wei, Weixian
    Ma, Xili
    Li, Peng
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2018, 50 (04) : 389 - 406
  • [29] A CGE Analysis of the Impacts of a Carbon Tax on Provincial Economy in China
    Zhang, Xingping
    Guo, Zhengquan
    Zheng, Yuhua
    Zhu, Jinchen
    Yang, Jing
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2016, 52 (06) : 1372 - 1384
  • [30] Methodological proposal to approximate the sectoral impacts of a carbon tax at the regional level - the case of Chile
    Mardones, Cristian
    Correa, Matias
    ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2025, 37 (01) : 52 - 75