Influence of preservation of the alveolar ridge on delayed implants after extraction of teeth with different defects in the buccal bone

被引:12
作者
Pang, Chaoyuan [1 ]
Ding, Yuxiang [2 ]
Hu, Kaijin [2 ]
Zhou, Hongzhi [2 ]
Qin, Ruifeng [2 ]
Hou, Rui [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army, Lanzhou Command, Lanzhou Gen Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, Peoples R China
[2] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Sch Stomatol, Dept Oral Surg, State Key Lab Mil Stomatol, 145 Western Changle Rd, Xian 710032, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Alveolar ridge preservation; Bone graft; Delayed implant; Buccal bone defect; Implant stability; ACID-ETCHED SURFACE; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; TOOTH EXTRACTION; CLINICAL-TRIAL; ALLOGRAFT; XENOGRAFT; SOCKETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.11.025
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Our aim was to evaluate the influence of preservation of the alveolar ridge on delayed implants with different defects in the buccal bone. We enrolled 60 patients who had one posterior mandibular tooth extracted. Cone-beam computed tomography (CT) was used to measure the buccal bone defects in the alveolar ridge before the tooth was extracted (level A=3 to 5 mm, and level B=more than 5 mm). After the tooth had been extracted, the socket either had the alveolar ridge preserved (trial group) or it was left to heal spontaneously (control group). The changes in the dimensions of the alveolar ridge from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively were evaluated by cone-beam CT. Suitable implants were inserted 6 months later, and their length and diameter recorded. The implant stability quotient was evaluated for the following 3 months. The dimensions of the bone in the alveolar ridge in the trial group were significantly less than those in the control groups in both levels. Fifty-seven patients required implants (except 3 in level B in the control group). There were more longer and wider implants in the trial group than in the control group in Level B. 3 months after implantation, there were no significant differences in implant stability quotients between the groups, though in the control group, Level B, the mean (SD) value was 69.50 (1.00) while in the other groups values were all above 70 at 3 months. We conclude that when the defect in the buccal bone was more than 5 mm, the alveolar ridge preservation demonstrated a remarkable effect in preserving the alveolar ridge dimension and delayed implantation. (C) 2015 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 180
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Accorsi-Mendonça Thais, 2008, Braz. oral res., V22, P5
[2]  
Albrektsson T, 1986, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V1, P11
[3]   Effect of a xenograft on early bone formation in extraction sockets: an experimental study in dog [J].
Araujo, M. ;
Linder, E. ;
Lindhe, J. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (01) :1-6
[4]   A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate and Compare Implants Placed in Augmented Versus Non-Augmented Extraction Sockets: 3-Year Results [J].
Barone, Antonio ;
Orlando, Bruno ;
Cingano, Luciano ;
Marconcini, Simone ;
Derchi, Giacomo ;
Covani, Ugo .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2012, 83 (07) :836-846
[5]   Clinical and histologic observations of sites implanted with intraoral autologous bone grafts or allografts. 15 human case reports [J].
Becker, W ;
Urist, M ;
Becker, BE ;
Jackson, W ;
Parry, DA ;
Bartold, M ;
Vincenzzi, G ;
DeGeorges, D ;
Niederwanger, M .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1996, 67 (10) :1025-1033
[6]   Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. A clinical resonance-frequency analysis study with sandblasted-and-etched ITI implants [J].
Bischof, M ;
Nedir, R ;
Szmukler-Moncler, S ;
Bernard, JP ;
Samson, J .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (05) :529-539
[7]  
Cardaropoli D, 2012, INT J PERIODONT REST, V32, P421
[8]   The use of reduced healing times on ITI® implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface:: Early results from clinical trials on ITI® SLA implants [J].
Cochran, DL ;
Buser, D ;
ten Bruggenkate, CM ;
Weingart, D ;
Taylor, TM ;
Bernard, JP ;
Peters, F ;
Simpson, JP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (02) :144-153
[9]  
Cochran DL, 1998, J BIOMED MATER RES, V40, P1, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-Q