The effect of experimental pain on motor training performance and sensorimotor integration

被引:34
作者
Dancey, Erin [1 ]
Murphy, Bernadette [1 ]
Srbely, John [2 ]
Yielder, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Hlth Sci, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Human Hlth & Nutr, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP); Motor training; Pain; Sensorimotor integration (SMI); SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED-POTENTIALS; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; CORTICOMOTOR CONTROL; MULTIPLE LEVELS; MEDIAN NERVE; CORTEX; ACQUISITION; CEREBELLUM; FINGER; REORGANIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-014-3966-1
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Experimental pain is known to affect neuroplasticity of the motor cortex as well as motor performance, but less is known about neuroplasticity of somatosensory processing in the presence of pain. Early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) provide a mechanism for investigating alterations in sensory processing and sensorimotor integration (SMI). The overall aim of this study was to investigate the interactive effects of acute pain, motor training, and sensorimotor processing. Two groups of twelve participants (N = 24) were randomly assigned to either an intervention (capsaicin cream) or placebo (inert lotion) group. SEP amplitudes were collected by stimulation of the median nerve at baseline, post-application and post-motor training. Participants performed a motor sequence task while reaction time and accuracy data were recorded. The amplitude of the P22-N24 complex was significantly increased following motor training for both groups F(2,23) = 3.533, p < 0.05, while Friedman's test for the P22-N30 complex showed a significant increase in the intervention group [chi (2) (df = 2, p = 0.016) = 8.2], with no significant change in the placebo group. Following motor training, reaction time was significantly decreased for both groups F(1,23) = 59.575, p < 0.01 and overall accuracy differed by group [chi (2) (df = 3, p < 0.001) = 19.86], with post hoc testing indicating that the intervention group improved in accuracy following motor training [chi (2) (df = 1, p = 0.001) = 11.77] while the placebo group had worse accuracy [chi (2) (df = 1, p = 0.006) = 7.67]. The improved performance in the presence of capsaicin provides support for the enhancement of knowledge acquisition with the presence of nontarget stimuli. In addition, the increase in SEP peak amplitudes suggests that early SEP changes are markers of SMI changes accompanying motor training and acute pain.
引用
收藏
页码:2879 / 2889
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
[11]   Nociceptive plasticity inhibits adaptive learning in the spinal cord [J].
Ferguson, A. R. ;
Crown, E. D. ;
Grau, J. W. .
NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 141 (01) :421-431
[13]   MOTOR PRACTICE AND NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL ADAPTATION IN THE CEREBELLUM - A POSITRON TOMOGRAPHY STUDY [J].
FRISTON, KJ ;
FRITH, CD ;
PASSINGHAM, RE ;
LIDDLE, PF ;
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1992, 248 (1323) :223-228
[14]   THE EFFECTS OF STIMULUS RATES UPON MEDIAN, ULNAR AND RADIAL NERVE SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS [J].
FUJII, M ;
YAMADA, T ;
AIHARA, M ;
KOKUBUN, Y ;
NOGUCHI, Y ;
MATSUBARA, M ;
YEH, MH .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 92 (06) :518-526
[15]   Cerebellum implicated in sensory acquisition and discrimination rather than motor control [J].
Gao, JH ;
Parsons, LM ;
Bower, JM ;
Xiong, JH ;
Li, JQ ;
Fox, PT .
SCIENCE, 1996, 272 (5261) :545-547
[16]  
GRAFTON ST, 1992, J NEUROSCI, V12, P2542
[17]   Selective changes in cerebellar-cortical processing following motor training [J].
Haavik, H. ;
Murphy, B. A. .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2013, 231 (04) :397-403
[18]   Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding - A PET study [J].
Hazeltine, E ;
Grafton, ST ;
Ivry, R .
BRAIN, 1997, 120 :123-140
[19]  
Hlustík P, 2004, J CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V21, P180
[20]   Pain and motor control of the lumbopelvic region: effect and possible mechanisms [J].
Hodges, PW ;
Moseley, GL .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (04) :361-370