A DEA-BASED APPROACH TO RANKING MULTI-CRITERIA ALTERNATIVES

被引:36
作者
Koeksalan, Murat [1 ]
Tuncer, Ceren [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; multi-objective; integer programming; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; UNITS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1142/S0219622009003259
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We propose a data envelopment analysis (DEA)-based approach to ranking multi-criteria alternatives. We call it "the area of the efficiency score graph" (AES) approach. Unlike the classical DEA score and D(k) measure that counts the number of DMUs (alternatives in DEA terminology) that should be removed from the set for each DMU k to become efficient, AES is not fully dependent on relative values of inputs/outputs of the alternatives in the set. It considers the change in efficiency scores of the alternatives while we delete 0, ... , D(k) number of alternatives from the set. The method avoids the negative effect of outliers and crowding in certain areas. It favors DMUs that manage to improve their efficiency scores quickly as we delete units from the set, and also alternatives that maintain high levels of efficiency scores as we delete units. We propose inclusion of weight restrictions into AES to incorporate decision maker preferences into the analysis. We apply our approach to ranking MBA programs. We provide rank lists of MBA programs by both AES and another DEA-based method for comparison. We also use AES scores to place programs in a small number of classes that are preference ordered from the best to the worst.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 54
页数:26
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Improving envelopment in data envelopment analysis [J].
Allen, R ;
Thanassoulis, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 154 (02) :363-379
[2]   Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: Evolution, development and future directions [J].
Allen, R ;
Athanassopoulos, A ;
Dyson, RG ;
Thanassoulis, E .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1997, 73 (0) :13-34
[3]   A PROCEDURE FOR RANKING EFFICIENT UNITS IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
ANDERSEN, P ;
PETERSEN, NC .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (10) :1261-1265
[4]   The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model [J].
Anderson, TR ;
Hollingsworth, K ;
Inman, L .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2002, 17 (03) :249-255
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Financial Times
[6]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[7]   Using super-efficiency dea to evaluate financial performance of e-business initiative in the retail industry [J].
Chen, Y ;
Motiwalla, L ;
Khan, MR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2004, 3 (02) :337-351
[8]   A DATA ENVELOPMENT MODEL FOR AGGREGATING PREFERENCE RANKINGS [J].
COOK, WD ;
KRESS, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (11) :1302-1310
[9]   Distance-based and ad hoc consensus models in ordinal preference ranking [J].
Cook, WD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 172 (02) :369-385
[10]  
DOYLE J, 1994, J OPER RES SOC, V45, P567, DOI 10.1038/sj/jors/0450509