AI Approaches towards Prechtl's Assessment of General Movements: A Systematic Literature Review

被引:39
|
作者
Irshad, Muhammad Tausif [1 ,2 ]
Nisar, Muhammad Adeel [1 ,2 ]
Gouverneur, Philip [1 ]
Rapp, Marion [3 ]
Grzegorzek, Marcin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lubeck, Inst Med Informat, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23562 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Univ Punjab, Punjab Univ Coll Informat Technol, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
[3] Univ Lubeck, Clin Pediat & Adolescent Med, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23562 Lubeck, Germany
关键词
general movement assessment; fidgety movements; cerebral palsy; motion sensors; visual sensors; multimodal sensing; physical activity assessment; machine learning; artificial neural network; CEREBRAL-PALSY; PRETERM INFANTS; VIDEO ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT-ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; QUALITATIVE CHANGES; EARLY INTERVENTION; TERM AGE; CLASSIFICATION; MARKER;
D O I
10.3390/s20185321
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
General movements (GMs) are spontaneous movements of infants up to five months post-term involving the whole body varying in sequence, speed, and amplitude. The assessment of GMs has shown its importance for identifying infants at risk for neuromotor deficits, especially for the detection of cerebral palsy. As the assessment is based on videos of the infant that are rated by trained professionals, the method is time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, approaches based on Artificial Intelligence have gained significantly increased attention in the last years. In this article, we systematically analyze and discuss the main design features of all existing technological approaches seeking to transfer the Prechtl's assessment of general movements from an individual visual perception to computer-based analysis. After identifying their shared shortcomings, we explain the methodological reasons for their limited practical performance and classification rates. As a conclusion of our literature study, we conceptually propose a methodological solution to the defined problem based on the groundbreaking innovation in the area of Deep Learning.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 32
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Unraveling asset pricing with AI: A systematic literature review
    Chen, Yan
    Zhang, Lin
    Xie, Zhilong
    Zhang, Wenjie
    Li, Qing
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2025, 175
  • [22] AI in Healthcare and Medicine: A Systematic Literature Review and Reappraisal
    Clark, Heidi B.
    Egger, James
    Duffy, Vincent G.
    DIGITAL HUMAN MODELING AND APPLICATIONS IN HEALTH, SAFETY, ERGONOMICS AND RISK MANAGEMENT, PT II, DHM 2024, 2024, 14710 : 251 - 270
  • [23] Hybrid approaches to optimization and machine learning methods: a systematic literature review
    Azevedo, Beatriz Flamia
    Rocha, Ana Maria A. C.
    Pereira, Ana I.
    MACHINE LEARNING, 2024, 113 (07) : 4055 - 4097
  • [24] Recent Applications of Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Literature Review
    Saarela, Mirka
    Podgorelec, Vili
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (19):
  • [25] AI-driven crime prediction: a systematic literature review
    Nadeem Iqbal
    Awais Hassan
    Talha Waheed
    Journal of Computational Social Science, 2025, 8 (2):
  • [26] Open source intelligence and AI: a systematic review of the GELSI literature
    Ghioni, Riccardo
    Taddeo, Mariarosaria
    Floridi, Luciano
    AI & SOCIETY, 2024, 39 (04) : 1827 - 1842
  • [27] Systematic literature review on approaches of extracting image merits
    Onaizah, Ameer N.
    Xia, Yuanqing
    Zhan, Yufeng
    Hussain, Khurram
    Koondhar, Iftikhar Ahmed
    OPTIK, 2022, 271
  • [28] A systematic literature review of software requirements reuse approaches
    Irshad, Mohsin
    Petersen, Kai
    Poulding, Simon
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 93 : 223 - 245
  • [29] A systematic literature review of speech emotion recognition approaches
    Singh, Youddha Beer
    Goel, Shivani
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2022, 492 : 245 - 263
  • [30] Design pattern detection approaches: a systematic review of the literature
    Yarahmadi, Hadis
    Hasheminejad, Seyed Mohammad Hossein
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2020, 53 (08) : 5789 - 5846