Surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty: Our institutional experience

被引:23
|
作者
Kinov, Plamen [1 ]
Volpin, Gershon [2 ,3 ]
Sevi, Roger [4 ]
Tanchev, Panayot P. [1 ]
Antonov, Boris [1 ]
Hakim, Geries [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Sofia, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Univ Hosp Queen Giovanna ISUL, Sofia 1527, Bulgaria
[2] EMMS Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, Nazaret, Israel
[3] Bar Ilan Univ, Galilee Med Fac Sfad, IL-52100 Ramat Gan, Israel
[4] Hillel Yafe Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, Hadera, Israel
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2015年 / 46卷 / 10期
关键词
Periprosthetic fracture; Hip arthroplasty; Osteosynthesis; Revision; Outcome; Vancouver classification; FEMUR; CLASSIFICATION; REVISION; IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2015.06.017
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: Periprosthetic fractures are one of the most serious complications after hip replacement. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty using treatment algorithm of the Vancouver classification. Materials and methods: Fifty six periprosthetic femoral fractures operated on during the period December 2004-September 2013 were followed-up retrospectively. There were 40 women and 16 men with mean age at the time of surgery 64.7 years (41-88 years). The mean follow-up for the group was 5 years (range, 1-10 years). Periprosthetic fractures were classified according to the Vancouver classification. The clinical evaluation was performed with the Harris hip score, the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short Form 8 (SF-8). Bone healing, implant survival, pain, function and complications were recorded. Bone healing and implant stability were evaluated clinically and on plain radiographs. Results: Uneventful bone healing was achieved in 52 cases. In two fractures (one type B1, one type C) nonunion and plate failure occurred. Two cemented stems were revised for aseptic loosening 6.5 and 7 years after fracture fixation. Uncontrollable prosthesis infection and sepsis in a rheumatoid (immunocompromised) patient required disarticulation of the involved extremity. Discussion and conclusions: Periprosthetic femoral fractures are difficult to treat and require complex treatment approach according to risk assessment, fracture type, implant stability, bone stock and medical status of the patient. Using a treatment protocol of the Vancouver classification we obtained satisfactory outcome. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1945 / 1950
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty with specially constructed retrograde hollow nails
    Szalay, G.
    Meyer, C.
    Mika, J.
    Schnettler, R.
    Thormann, U.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2014, 26 (06): : 611 - 624
  • [42] In Silico Evaluation of Treatment of Periprosthetic Fractures in Elderly Patients After Hip Arthroplasty
    Lorkowski, Jacek
    Wilk, Renata
    Pokorski, Mieczyslaw
    MEDICAL AND BIOMEDICAL UPDATES, 2021, 1289 : 115 - 123
  • [43] Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Hip Replacement: Our Results and Treatment Complications
    Pavelka, T.
    Salasek, M.
    Weisova, D.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2017, 84 (01) : 52 - 58
  • [44] Periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with contralateral hip disease
    Yun, AG
    Dorr, LD
    Long, WT
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (07): : 957 - 959
  • [45] Uncemented revision hip arthroplasty in B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures - A prospective analysis
    Rayan, Faizal
    Konan, Sujith
    Haddad, Fares S.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 20 (01) : 38 - 42
  • [46] Risk factors influencing fracture characteristics in postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented stems in total hip arthroplasty A MULTICENTRE OBSERVATIONAL COHORT STUDY ON 584 FRACTURES
    Jain, S.
    Lamb, J.
    Townsend, O.
    Scott, C. E. H.
    Kendrick, B.
    Middleton, R.
    Jones, S. A.
    Board, T.
    West, R.
    Pandit, H.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2021, 2 (07): : 466 - 475
  • [47] Less invasive stabilization system for the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty
    Kumar, Vijaya
    Kanabar, Prashant
    Owen, P. Julian
    Rushton, Neil
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (03): : 446 - 450
  • [48] Evaluating the Functional and Psychological Outcomes Following Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Islam, Rifat
    Lanting, Brent
    Somerville, Lyndsay
    Hunter, Susan W.
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2022, 18 : 57 - 62
  • [49] The reliability and validity of the Unified Classification System of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty
    Huang, Jie-Feng
    Chen, Jun-Jie
    Shen, Jian-Jian
    Du, Wen-Xi
    Liu, Fu-Cun
    Tong, Pei-Jian
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2016, 82 (02): : 233 - 239
  • [50] Current Methods for the Evaluation and Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Complicating Hip Arthroplasty
    Maurer, Elke
    DeRogatis, Michael J.
    Issack, Paul S.
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2021, 79 (02): : 98 - 107