Aprosodia Following Focal Brain Damage: What's and What's Left?

被引:4
|
作者
Ukaegbe, Onyinyechi C. [1 ]
Holt, Brooke E. [1 ]
Keator, Lynsey M. [2 ]
Brownell, Hiram [3 ]
Blake, Margaret Lehman [4 ]
Lundgren, Kristine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Boston Coll, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
[4] Univ Houston, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Houston, TX 77004 USA
关键词
Editor; Michael de Riesthal; RIGHT-HEMISPHERE STROKE; EMOTIONAL EXPRESSION; LINGUISTIC PROSODY; LANGUAGE FUNCTIONS; PERCEPTION; LESION; SPECIALIZATION; IDENTIFICATION; INTONATION; DEFICITS;
D O I
10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00302
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Hemispheric specialization for the comprehension and expression of lin-guistic and emotional prosody is typically attributed to the right hemisphere. This study used techniques adapted from meta-analysis to critically examine the strength of existing evidence for hemispheric lateralization of prosody following brain damage. Method: Twenty-one databases were searched for articles published from 1970 to 2020 addressing differences in prosody performance between groups defined by right hemisphere damage and left hemisphere damage. Hedges's g effect sizes were calculated for all possible prosody comparisons. Primary analyses summarize effects for four types: linguistic production, linguistic comprehension, emotion comprehension, and emotion production. Within each primary analysis, Hedges's g values were averaged across comparisons (usually from a single article) based on the same sample of individuals. Secondary analyses explore more specific classifications of comparisons. Results: Out of the 113 articles investigating comprehension and production of emotional and linguistic prosody, 62 were deemed appropriate for data extrac-tion, but only 21 met inclusion criteria, passed quality reviews, and provided sufficient information for analysis. Evidence from this review illustrates the hetero-geneity of research methods and results from studies that have investigated aprosodia. This review provides inconsistent support for selective contribution of the two cerebral hemispheres to prosody comprehension and production; however, the strongest finding suggests that right hemisphere lesions disrupt emotional prosody comprehension more than left hemisphere lesions. Conclusion: This review highlights the impoverished nature of the existing liter-ature; offers suggestions for future research; and highlights relevant clinical implications for the prognostication, evaluation, and treatment of aprosodia. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.20334987
引用
收藏
页码:2313 / 2328
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Memory and the brain: What's right and what's left?
    Poldrack, RA
    Gabrieli, JDE
    CELL, 1998, 93 (07) : 1091 - 1093
  • [2] WHAT'S LEFT
    Rauschenbusch, Stephanie
    AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW, 2011, 32 (04) : 27 - 28
  • [3] What's Left
    Black, Candace
    SOUTH DAKOTA REVIEW, 2017, 53 (01): : 38 - 40
  • [4] 'What's Left?'
    Simpson, A
    DESCANT, 2002, 33 (04): : 60 - 62
  • [5] What's left?
    Hubbard, Sue
    APOLLO-THE INTERNATIONAL ART MAGAZINE, 2014, 179 (616): : 56 - 59
  • [6] 'What's left'
    Sindall, S
    AGENDA, 2005, 41 (3-4): : 210 - 211
  • [7] & WHAT'S LEFT
    Rubio, Tano
    APPALACHIAN HERITAGE-A LITERARY QUARTERLY OF THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS, 2022, 50 (02): : 102 - 103
  • [8] What's Left
    Di Piero, W. S.
    POETRY, 2011, 198 (01) : 24 - 24
  • [9] What's on the left?
    Isambert, Paul
    DISCOURS-REVUE DE LINGUISTIQUE PSYCHOLINGUISTIQUE ET INFORMATIQUE, 2011, (08):
  • [10] 'What's Left'
    Soto, G
    TRIQUARTERLY, 2001, (110-11): : 158 - 158