Cost - Benefit of water resource use in biofuel feedstock production

被引:9
作者
Kaenchan, Piyanon [1 ,2 ]
Gheewala, Shabbir H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Joint Grad Sch Energy & Environm, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] PERDO, Ctr Excellence Energy Technol & Environm, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Biofuels; Water resource; Cost-benefit analysis; Economic valuation; Life cycle impact assessment; SYSTEMS-ANALYSIS TOOLS; FOOTPRINT; VALUATION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.129
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An increase in the output of crops such as cassava, sugarcane, and oil palm, is necessary for biofuels development. To increase the crop yield, a large amount of water is required which can have an impact on the net social welfare. This study aims to assess the benefit and cost of water resource use in biofuel crops production to support the cost-benefit analysis of biofuels development. Benefit of water is presented through the value of its marginal product estimated by using economic valuation methods. The loss due to water consumption is assessed and monetized based on life cycle impact assessment. To show how the approach is applied to the regional level, Thailand is considered as a case study. The results show that the economic gains from using a cubic meter of water in cassava, sugarcane, and oil palm production are 1.6-6.9, 1.0-5.0, and 0.8-2.9 Thai baht, respectively. However, using this amount of water can also bring about the external cost around 0.2 Thai baht, leading to the net benefits of using a cubic meter of water in cassava, sugarcane, and oil palm production between 1.5 and 6.7, 0.9-4.8, and 0.6-2.6 Thai baht, respectively. Gain and loss of the water used in cassava, sugarcane, and oil palm cultivation are expressed in monetary units for the first time by this study. Besides, this paper could be a guideline for future research towards an integration of life cycle impact assessment and the economic analysis tool, cost benefit analysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1192 / 1199
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Agudelo J.I., 2001, UNESCO IHE VALUE WAT, V5
[2]   Weighting and valuation in selected environmental systems analysis tools - suggestions for further developments [J].
Ahlroth, Sofia ;
Nilsson, Mans ;
Finnveden, Goran ;
Hjelm, Olof ;
Hochschorner, Elisabeth .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (2-3) :145-156
[3]  
Al-Karablieh E. K., 2012, Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, B, V2, P487
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Food and Agricultural commodities production
[5]  
[Anonymous], VALUE WATER RES REPO
[6]   Hydrological impact of biofuel production: A case study of the Khlong Phlo Watershed in Thailand [J].
Babel, M. S. ;
Shrestha, B. ;
Perret, S. R. .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2011, 101 (01) :8-26
[7]  
Brito R, 2012, Responding to climate change in Mozambique: theme 6-agriculture
[8]  
Bureau of Trade and Economic Indices, 2015, PERC CHANG NAT CONS
[9]  
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), 2015, AQUASTAT WAT US
[10]   Environmental systems analysis tools -: an overview [J].
Finnveden, G ;
Moberg, Å .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2005, 13 (12) :1165-1173