Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States, 2012 to 2019

被引:22
|
作者
Upfill-Brown, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Hsiue, Peter P. [1 ]
Sekimura, Troy [1 ]
Shi, Brendan [1 ]
Ahlquist, Seth A. [1 ]
Patel, Jay N. [1 ]
Adamson, Micah [1 ]
Stavrakis, Alexandra I. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCLA, Dept Orthopaed Surg, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] UCLA, Dept Orthopaed Surg, David Geffen Sch Med, 1250 16th St,Suite 2100, Santa Monica, CA 90404 USA
来源
ARTHROPLASTY TODAY | 2022年 / 15卷
关键词
Revision total knee arthroplasty; Clinical epidemiology; National trends; Healthcare resource utilization; TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY; CROSS-LINKED POLYETHYLENE; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; RISK-FACTORS; ICD; 10; REPLACEMENT; PROJECTIONS; COMPLICATIONS; DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: As primary total knee arthroplasty volume continues to increase, so will the number of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) procedures. The purpose of this study is to provide an updated perspective on the incidence, indications, and financial burden of rTKA in the United States.Material and methods: This was a retrospective epidemiologic analysis using the National Inpatient Sample. International Classification of Diseases ninth and tenth revision codes were used to identify patients who underwent rTKA and create cohorts based on rTKA indications from 2012 to 2019. National and regional trends for length of stay, cost, and discharge location were evaluated.Results: A total of 505,160 rTKA procedures were identified. The annual number of rTKA procedures increased by 29.6% over the study period (56,490 to 73,205). The top 3 indications for rTKA were aseptic loosening (23.1%), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (20.4%), and instability (11.0%). Over the study period, the proportion of patients discharged to skilled nursing facility decreased from 31.7% to 24.1% (P < .001). Hospital length of stay decreased from 4.0 days in 2012 to 3.8 days in 2019 (P < .001). Hospital costs increased by $1300 from $25,730 to $27,077 (P < .001). The proportion of rTKA cases performed at urban academic centers increased (52.1% to 74.3%, P < .001) while that at urban nonacademic centers decreased (39.0% to 19.2%, P < .001).Conclusion: The top 3 indications for rTKA were aseptic loosening, PJI, and instability, with PJI becoming the most common indication in 2019. These cases are increasingly being performed at urban academic centers and away from urban nonacademic centers.Level of Evidence: 3 (Retrospective cohort study).(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 195.e6
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pseudoaneurysm after revision total knee arthroplasty
    Vallamshetla, Venkat Ram Prasad
    Sharma, Vishnu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2010, 20 (02) : 169 - 171
  • [32] Stiffness After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Kim, Gregory K.
    Mortazavi, Javad
    Purtill, James J.
    Sharkey, Peter F.
    Hozack, William J.
    Parvizi, Javad
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2010, 25 (06) : 844 - 850
  • [33] Incidence of Drug Abuse in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Population
    Roche, Martin
    Law, Tsun Yee
    Sodhi, Nipun
    Rosas, Samuel
    Kurowicki, Jennifer
    Disla, Shanell
    Wang, Kevin
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (10) : 928 - 933
  • [34] Understanding the 30-day mortality burden after revision total knee arthroplasty
    Sinclair, SaTia T.
    Orr, Melissa N.
    Rothfusz, Christopher A.
    Klika, Alison K.
    McLaughlin, John P.
    Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2021, 11 : 205 - 211
  • [35] Does Aseptic Revision Risk Differ for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Who Have and Do not Have a Prior Primary or Revision Arthroplasty?
    Prentice, Heather A.
    Chan, Priscilla H.
    Reddy, Nithin C.
    Navarro, Ronald A.
    Namba, Robert S.
    Paxton, Elizabeth W.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (01) : 43 - 50.e1
  • [36] Prevalence and Perioperative Outcomes of Off-Label Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States, 2000-2010
    Malcolm, Tennison
    Szubski, Caleb R.
    Schiltz, Nicholas K.
    Klika, Alison K.
    Koroukian, Siran M.
    Barsoum, Wael K.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (11) : 1872 - 1878
  • [37] Projected increase in total knee arthroplasty in the United States - an alternative projection model
    Inacio, M. C. S.
    Paxton, E. W.
    Graves, S. E.
    Namba, R. S.
    Nemes, S.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2017, 25 (11) : 1797 - 1803
  • [38] Alternatives to revision total knee arthroplasty
    Jones, R. E.
    Russell, R. D.
    Huo, M. H.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2012, 94B (11): : 137 - 140
  • [39] Blood Loss and Transfusion Rates in the Revision of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty to Total Knee Arthroplasty Are Similar to Those of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty But Are Lower Compared With the Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Cankaya, Deniz
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (01) : 339 - 341
  • [40] Trends in Revenue and Cost for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Ashkenazi, Itay
    Christensen, Thomas
    Ward, Spencer A.
    Bosco, Joseph A.
    Lajam, Claudette M.
    Slover, James
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (07) : S97 - S102