Joint inversion of InSAR, local seismic and teleseismic data sets for the rupture process of the 2020 Mw 6.3 Yutian earthquake and its implications

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Zhengsong [1 ,2 ]
Yi, Lei [3 ,4 ]
Luo, Jun [5 ]
Zuo, Kezhen [5 ]
机构
[1] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geophys, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Seismol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Qinghai Inst Salt Lakes, Key Lab Comprehens & Highly Efficient Utilizat Sa, Xining, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Qinghai Inst Salt Lakes, Qinghai Prov Key Lab Geol & Environm Salt Lakes, Xining, Peoples R China
[5] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Earthquake Forecasting, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
The 2020 Mw 6.3 Yutian earthquake; Joint inversion; Rupture process; Radiation efficiency; Coulomb stress change; Crustal extension; FAULT SYSTEM; 2015; GORKHA; M-W; SLIP; AFTERSHOCKS; TIBET; AREA; CONSTRAINTS; MODEL; SHOCK;
D O I
10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229289
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
On 25 June 2020, a Mw 6.3 earthquake struck Yutian county. The earthquake nucleated on a normal fault in the northwestern Tibetan Plateau. Through jointly inverting local seismic and teleseismic waveform data as well as Interfemmetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) Line-of-Sight (LOS) displacement data, the spatiotemporal rupture properties of this earthquake were resolved to investigate and better understand regional crustal extension mechanisms. Inversion results show that this event ruptured along one main asperity concentrated within a depth range of 4.1-13.3 km with a maximum slip of similar to 0.9 m. The rupture front propagated initially around the hypocenter and then unilaterally toward the north. The whole process lasted approximately 8 s and released a total scalar seismic moment of 3.2 x 10(18) Nm (Mw 6.3). The energy-based average stress drop was estimated in the range of 1.9-3.0 MPa. The radiation efficiency was estimated to be 10.0-15.8%, which is relatively low, demonstrating that most of the accumulated strain energy dissipated during rupturing. We suggest that the earthquake was possibly related to the nearby Cenozoic volcano in consideration of the dissipated rupture of the source and the west-dipping causative fault located on the western edge of the volcano. Both the westward motion of the western Kunlun block and the eastward motion of the Kunlun-Qaidam block were responsible for the EW-trending crustal extension in the Yutian district. We supposed that the 2020 normal faulting earthquake was primarily attributed to the different velocities of the Kunlun-Qaidam block moving eastward. Additionally, according to an analysis of coseismic Coulomb stress interactions, the previous 2008 Mw 7.1, 2012 Mw 6.2, and 2014 Mw 6.9 Yutian earthquakes contribute small Coulomb stress disturbance on the hypocenter of the 2020 Mw 6.3 Yutian earthquake which suggest that previous Yutian earthquakes have a limited effect on triggering the 2020 event.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rupture history of the 2008 Mw6.3 Da Qaidam earthquake by joint inversion of teleseismic data and InSAR measurements
    Wen ShaoYan
    Shan XinJian
    Zhang GuoHong
    Zhang YingFeng
    Qu ChunYan
    Zhao DeZheng
    Li YanChuan
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2018, 61 (06): : 2301 - 2309
  • [2] Rupture process of the 2016 Mw 7.8 Ecuador earthquake from joint inversion of InSAR data and teleseismic P waveforms
    Yi, Lei
    Xu, Caijun
    Wen, Yangmao
    Zhang, Xu
    Jiang, Guoyan
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 2018, 722 : 163 - 174
  • [3] Slip Model of the 2020 Yutian (Northwestern Tibetan Plateau) Earthquake Derived From Joint Inversion of InSAR and Teleseismic Data
    Li, Qi
    Li, Chengtao
    Tan, Kai
    Lu, Xiaofei
    Zuo, Xiao
    EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2021, 8 (06)
  • [4] Rupture process of the 2015 Pishan earthquake from joint inversion of InSAR, teleseismic data and GPS
    Xun WANG
    Weimin WANG
    Junmeng ZHAO
    Zhenxing YAO
    ScienceChina(EarthSciences), 2018, 61 (10) : 1467 - 1481
  • [5] Rupture process of the 2015 Pishan earthquake from joint inversion of InSAR, teleseismic data and GPS
    Xun Wang
    Weimin Wang
    Junmeng Zhao
    Zhenxing Yao
    Science China Earth Sciences, 2018, 61 : 1467 - 1481
  • [6] Rupture process of the 2015 Pishan earthquake from joint inversion of InSAR, teleseismic data and GPS
    Wang, Xun
    Wang, Weimin
    Zhao, Junmeng
    Yao, Zhenxing
    SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2018, 61 (10) : 1467 - 1481
  • [7] Joint inversion of teleseismic and InSAR datasets for the rupture process of the 2010 Yushu, China, earthquake
    Yusuke Yokota
    Yasuyuki Kawazoe
    Sunhe Yun
    Satoko Oki
    Yosuke Aoki
    Kazuki Koketsu
    Earth, Planets and Space, 2012, 64 : 1047 - 1051
  • [8] Joint inversion of teleseismic and InSAR datasets for the rupture process of the 2010 Yushu, China, earthquake
    Yokota, Yusuke
    Kawazoe, Yasuyuki
    Yun, Sunhe
    Oki, Satoko
    Aoki, Yosuke
    Koketsu, Kazuki
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2012, 64 (11): : 1047 - 1051
  • [9] Joint inversion of GPS, InSAR and teleseismic data sets for the rupture process of the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake using a generalized ABIC method
    Yi, Lei
    Xu, Caijun
    Zhang, Xu
    Wen, Yangmao
    Jiang, Guoyan
    Li, Mengkui
    Wang, Yuebin
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2017, 148 : 121 - 130
  • [10] Rupture Process of the 2017 Mw 6.3 Earthquake in Jinghe, Northwest China, Constrained by GNSS, InSAR, and Teleseismic Waveforms
    Xiao, Zhuohui
    Wang, Jianjun
    Xu, Caijun
    Freymueller, Jeffrey T.
    Wen, Yangmao
    Zhang, Zhibin
    Li, Jie
    Zhao, Bin
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 93 (04) : 2027 - 2037