Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

被引:111
作者
Torloni, M. R. [1 ,2 ]
Vedmedovska, N. [3 ]
Merialdi, M. [4 ]
Betran, A. P. [4 ]
Allen, T. [5 ]
Gonzalez, R. [6 ]
Platt, L. D. [7 ]
机构
[1] Brazilian Cochrane Ctr, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Obstet, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Riga Stradins Univ, Riga Matern Hosp, Riga, Latvia
[4] WHO, Dept Reprod Hlth & Res, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[5] WHO, Dept Knowledge Management & Sharing, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Chilean Minist Hlth, Off Womens Hlth Issues, Santiago, Chile
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
adverse effects; diagnostic imaging; diagnostic techniques; fetus; obstetric and gynecological; pregnancy; prenatal; prenatal injuries; safety; ultrasonography; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PRENATAL ULTRASOUND EXAMINATIONS; DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND; BIRTH-WEIGHT; IN-UTERO; DOPPLER ULTRASOUND; SUBSEQUENT GROWTH; GESTATIONAL-AGE; FOLLOW-UP; ROUTINE;
D O I
10.1002/uog.6328
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective In the context of the planned International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology-World Health Organization multicenter study for the development of fetal growth standards for international application, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of human exposure to ultrasonography in pregnancy. Methods A systematic search of electronic databases, reference lists and unpublished literature was conducted for trials and observational studies that assessed short- and long-term effects of exposure to ultrasonography, involving women and their fetuses exposed to ultrasonograpby, using B-mode or Doppler sonography during any period of pregnancy, for any number of times. The outcome measures were: (1) adverse maternal outcome; (2) adverse perinatal outcome; (3) abnormal childhood growth and neurological development, (4) non-right handedness; (5) childhood malignancy; and (6) intellectual performance and mental disease. Results The electronic search identified 6716 citations, and 19 were identified from secondary sources. A total of 6.1 publications reporting data from 41. different studies were included: 16 controlled trials,13 cohort and 12 case-control studies. Ultrasonography in pregnancy was not associated with adverse maternal or perinatal outcome, impaired physical or neurological development, increased risk for malignancy in childhood, subnormal intellectual performance or mental diseases. According to the available clinical trials, there was a weak association between exposure to ultrasonograpby and non-right handedness in boys (odds ratio 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.54). Conclusion According to the available evidence, exposure to diagnostic ultrasonography during pregnancy appears to be safe. Copyright (C) World Health Organization (2009).
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 608
页数:10
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, V104, P419
  • [2] BAKKETEIG LS, 1984, LANCET, V2, P207
  • [3] BELFRAGE P, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V69, P747
  • [4] Is an excessive number of prenatal echographies a risk for fetal growth?
    Bellieni, CV
    Buonocore, G
    Bagnoli, F
    Cordelli, DM
    Gasparre, O
    Calonaci, F
    Filardi, G
    Merola, A
    Petraglia, F
    [J]. EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 81 (08) : 689 - 693
  • [5] Bricker L., 2000, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V4, P1, DOI [DOI 10.3310/hta4160, 10.3310/hta4160]
  • [6] BUNIN GR, 1994, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V3, P197
  • [7] CAMPBELL JD, 1993, CAN MED ASSOC J, V149, P1435
  • [8] CARTWRIGHT RA, 1984, LANCET, V2, P999
  • [9] EFFECTS OF 2 ULTRASOUND SCANNING REGIMENS ON THE MANAGEMENT OF PREGNANCY
    COCHLIN, DL
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1984, 91 (09): : 885 - 890
  • [10] Is an ultrasound assessment of gestational age at the first antenatal visit of value? A randomised clinical trial
    Crowther, CA
    Kornman, L
    O'Callaghan, S
    George, K
    Furness, M
    Willson, K
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (12): : 1273 - 1279