Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of 3 techniques

被引:54
|
作者
Barrilleaux, PS [1 ]
Bofill, JA
Terrone, DA
Magann, EF
May, WL
Morrison, JC
机构
[1] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, University, MS 38677 USA
[2] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, University, MS 38677 USA
关键词
misoprostol; cervical ripening; induction; Foley catheter;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.123821
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 3 different techniques of cervical ripening and induction. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who required cervical ripening and induction were randomized to one of 3 groups: (1) supracervical Foley catheter and intravaginal dinoprostone gel, (2) supracervical Foley catheter and 100 mug oral doses of misoprostol, or (3) serial 100-mug oral doses of misoprostol. Intravenous oxytocin was administered when a protraction disorder of labor was identified. RESULTS: There were 339 women randomized. There was no significant difference in the time from first intervention to delivery in the 3 groups (P=.546). In each group, a similar percentage of women required oxytocin (P=.103). The rates of cesarean delivery were equivalent among the groups (P=.722). Rates of tachysystole were high but statistically equivalent among the 3 groups. There were no significant differences in Apgar scores or umbilical artery pH. CONCLUSION: Oral 100 mug serial doses of misoprostol, with or without the use of a supracervical Foley catheter, were equivalent to the use of a supracervical Foley catheter and serial 4-mg doses of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
引用
收藏
页码:1124 / 1129
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial
    de Oliveira e Oliveira, Maria Virginia
    von Oberst, Priscilla
    Correa Leite, Guilherme Karam
    Aguemi, Adalberto
    Kenj, Grecy
    de Toledo Leme, Vera Denise
    Sass, Nelson
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2010, 32 (07): : 346 - 351
  • [2] Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor
    Afolabi, BB
    Oyeneyin, OL
    Ogedengbe, OK
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 89 (03) : 263 - 267
  • [3] Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
    Roudsari, Fatemeh Vahid
    Ayati, Sedigheh
    Ghasemi, Marzieh
    Mofrad, Maliheh Hasanzadeh
    Shakeri, Mohamad Taghi
    Farshidi, Farnoush
    Shahabian, Masoud
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 10 (01): : 149 - 154
  • [4] Cervical ripening and induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter cervical traction
    Kashanian, M
    Akbarian, AR
    Fekrat, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 92 (01) : 79 - 80
  • [5] A randomized clinical trial comparing misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction
    Gupta, N.
    Mishra, S. L.
    Shradha, Jain
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2006, 56 (02): : 149 - 151
  • [6] Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction
    Chang, CH
    Chang, FM
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 96 (05) : 366 - 369
  • [7] A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction
    Chung, JH
    Huang, WH
    Rumney, PJ
    Garite, TJ
    Nageotte, MP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) : 1031 - 1035
  • [8] Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone versus foley catheter labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial
    Vallikkannu, Narayanan
    Laboh, Naumi
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    Hong, Jesrine Gek Shan
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Lim, Boon Kiong
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 306 (04) : 1027 - 1036
  • [9] Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor
    Nunes, F
    Rodrigues, R
    Meirinho, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (03) : 626 - 629
  • [10] Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone versus foley catheter labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial
    Narayanan Vallikkannu
    Naumi Laboh
    Peng Chiong Tan
    Jesrine Gek Shan Hong
    Mukhri Hamdan
    Boon Kiong Lim
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 306 : 1027 - 1036