Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of 3 techniques

被引:54
作者
Barrilleaux, PS [1 ]
Bofill, JA
Terrone, DA
Magann, EF
May, WL
Morrison, JC
机构
[1] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, University, MS 38677 USA
[2] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, University, MS 38677 USA
关键词
misoprostol; cervical ripening; induction; Foley catheter;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.123821
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 3 different techniques of cervical ripening and induction. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who required cervical ripening and induction were randomized to one of 3 groups: (1) supracervical Foley catheter and intravaginal dinoprostone gel, (2) supracervical Foley catheter and 100 mug oral doses of misoprostol, or (3) serial 100-mug oral doses of misoprostol. Intravenous oxytocin was administered when a protraction disorder of labor was identified. RESULTS: There were 339 women randomized. There was no significant difference in the time from first intervention to delivery in the 3 groups (P=.546). In each group, a similar percentage of women required oxytocin (P=.103). The rates of cesarean delivery were equivalent among the groups (P=.722). Rates of tachysystole were high but statistically equivalent among the 3 groups. There were no significant differences in Apgar scores or umbilical artery pH. CONCLUSION: Oral 100 mug serial doses of misoprostol, with or without the use of a supracervical Foley catheter, were equivalent to the use of a supracervical Foley catheter and serial 4-mg doses of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
引用
收藏
页码:1124 / 1129
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term [J].
Abramovici, D ;
Goldwasser, S ;
Mabie, BC ;
Mercer, BM ;
Goldwasser, R ;
Sibai, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (05) :1108-1112
[2]   Oral or vaginal misoprostol administration for induction of labor: A randomized, double-blind trial [J].
Adair, CD ;
Weeks, JW ;
Barrilleaux, S ;
Edwards, M ;
Burlison, K ;
Lewis, DF .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (05) :810-813
[3]   A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction [J].
Bennett, KA ;
Butt, K ;
Crane, JMG ;
Hutchens, D ;
Young, DC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (04) :481-486
[4]  
BISHOP EH, 1964, OBSTET GYNECOL, V24, P266
[5]   Safety and efficacy of misoprostol orally and vaginally: A randomized trial [J].
Carlan, SJ ;
Bouldin, S ;
Blust, D ;
O'Brien, WF .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (01) :107-112
[6]  
Greybush M, 2001, J REPROD MED, V46, P11
[7]   Cervical ripening: A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone [J].
Perry, KG ;
Larmon, JE ;
May, WL ;
Robinette, LG ;
Martin, RW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 178 (06) :1333-1337
[8]   Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: A systematic review of the literature [J].
Sanchez-Ramos, L ;
Kaunitz, AM .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 43 (03) :475-488
[9]   PREINDUCTION CERVICAL RIPENING WITH COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE PROSTAGLANDIN E(2) GEL - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON WITH A HOSPITAL-COMPOUNDED PREPARATION [J].
SANCHEZRAMOS, L ;
FARAH, LA ;
KAUNITZ, AM ;
ADAIR, CD ;
DELVALLE, GO ;
FUQUA, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (04) :1079-1084
[10]  
SANCHEZRAMOS L, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V81, P332