Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Distal Biliary Strictures: Value of Adding Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Conventional Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography

被引:13
作者
Yoo, Roh-Eul [1 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [1 ]
Yoon, Jeong Hee [1 ]
Kim, Jung Hoon [1 ]
Han, Joon Koo [1 ]
Choi, Byung Ihn [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
added value; diffusion-weighted imaging; magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; distal biliary strictures; characterization; GALLBLADDER LESIONS; MRI; TUMOR; CT; CARCINOMA; LIVER; ERCP; MRCP; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.24304
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo determine the value of adding diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to conventional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for differentiating benign from malignant distal biliary strictures. Materials and MethodsTwo independent readers reviewed three image sets (1: MRCP alone; 2: MRCP and DWI combined; and 3: MRCP, DWI, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging [T1WI] combined) of 60 patients with suspected distal biliary strictures and rated the probability of malignancy. Diagnostic performance and accuracy were compared using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and McNemar two-tailed test. coefficients were calculated to assess the interobserver agreement. ResultsThe Az value and accuracy improved significantly after additional review of DWI for both readers: Az=0.780 vs. 0.916 (P=0.003) for Reader 1 and 0.784 vs. 0.853 (P=0.037) for Reader 2; accuracy=69% vs. 93% for Reader 1 (P<0.001) and 57% vs. 85% for Reader 2 (P=0.002). No significant difference in the Az values and accuracy was found between MRCP and DWI combined, and MRCP, DWI, and contrast-enhanced T1WI combined (P>0.050). There was substantial interobserver agreement in all three image sets (=0.695-0.732). ConclusionThe addition of DWI to MRCP significantly improved diagnostic accuracy in the characterization of distal biliary strictures. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:1509-1517. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1509 / 1517
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations
    不详
    [J]. NEOPLASIA, 2009, 11 (02): : 102 - 125
  • [2] Balci Numan Cem, 2009, Top Magn Reson Imaging, V20, P43, DOI 10.1097/RMR.0b013e3181b48667
  • [3] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver: distinguishing hepatic abscess from cystic or necrotic tumor
    Chan, JHM
    Tsui, EYK
    Luk, SH
    Fung, ASL
    Yuen, MK
    Szeto, ML
    Cheung, YK
    Wong, KPC
    [J]. ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2001, 26 (02): : 161 - 165
  • [4] Differentiation of ampullary tumor from benign papillary stricture by thin-section multidetector CT
    Chang, Samuel
    Lim, Jae Hoon
    Choi, Dongil
    Kim, Seung Kwon
    Lee, Won Jae
    [J]. ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2008, 33 (04): : 457 - 462
  • [5] Differentiating malignant from benign common bile duct stricture with multiphasic helical CT
    Choi, SH
    Han, JK
    Lee, JM
    Lee, KH
    Kim, SH
    Lee, JY
    Choi, BI
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 236 (01) : 178 - 183
  • [6] Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Cui, Xing-Yu
    Chen, Hong-Wei
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (25) : 3196 - 3201
  • [7] Diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver-Interpretative pearls and pitfalls
    Culverwell, A. D.
    Sheridan, M. B.
    Guthrie, J. A.
    Scarsbrook, A. F.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 68 (04) : 406 - 414
  • [8] Girometti R, 2013, RADIOL MED, V118, P343, DOI 10.1007/s11547-012-0873-z
  • [9] Current management of biliary strictures
    Hall, JG
    Pappas, TN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2004, 8 (08) : 1098 - 1110
  • [10] MRCP vs ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies:: Review of current literature
    Hekimoglu, Koray
    Ustundag, Yucel
    Dusak, Abdurrahim
    Erdem, Zuhal
    Karademir, Bulent
    Aydemir, Selim
    Gundogdu, Sadi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2008, 9 (03) : 162 - 169