Smart Transportation for All? A Typology of Recent US Smart Transportation Projects in Midsized Cities

被引:22
作者
Kelley, Scott B. [1 ]
Lane, Bradley W. [2 ]
Stanley, Benjamin W. [3 ]
Kane, Kevin [4 ]
Nielsen, Eric [1 ]
Strachan, Scotty [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Dept Geog, Reno, NV 89557 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Sch Publ Affairs & Adm, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Univ City Exchange, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[4] Southern Calif Assoc Govt, Dept Res & Anal, Los Angeles, CA 90017 USA
[5] Univ Nevada, Off Informat Technol, Cyberinfrastruct, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
VEHICLES; MODEL; CITY;
D O I
10.1080/24694452.2019.1643702
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Greater integration of advanced vehicle technologies is commonly discussed as a component of developing smart cities, potentially leading to a host of benefits. Final impacts of such benefits are uncertain, though, given research that illustrates induced travel by initial adopters of emerging vehicle technologies and services and mixed effects in transit use and active transportation. The locations within cities where interventions of advanced vehicle technologies are envisioned, geographic scope and extent of integration, and the characteristics of these areas are all likely to influence these effects, and these relationships have received limited investigative attention. To address this, we conducted a comprehensive review of proposals submitted by 78 midsized cities in the United States to create a typology that considers (1) the geographic scope of intervention and (2) the degree of integration of connected and automated vehicles, generating five distinct types of projects. Characteristics of the areas within cities identified for intervention are compared to those of their U.S. Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). We identified indicators of comprehensive planning efforts as they relate to sustainability and resilience outcomes in each city. Results show that areas identified by cities for advanced vehicle technology interventions differ in important ways from each city's broader population that warrant attention relative to known demographic characteristics and behavior of early adopters of transportation technologies. There is also variation in project motivation and municipal planning indicators across typology classifications. These are essential considerations as smart city-aligned transportation interventions continue to develop. Key Words: automated vehicle, connected vehicle, smart city, typology.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 558
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Smart city policies: A spatial approach [J].
Angelidou, Margarita .
CITIES, 2014, 41 :S3-S11
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Final report
[3]  
Anthopoulos Leonidas, 2013, Electronic Journal of e-Government, V11, P326
[4]   Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective [J].
Bansal, Prateek ;
Kockelman, Kara M. ;
Singh, Amit .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, 67 :1-14
[5]   Smart cities of the future [J].
Batty, M. ;
Axhausen, K. W. ;
Giannotti, F. ;
Pozdnoukhov, A. ;
Bazzani, A. ;
Wachowicz, M. ;
Ouzounis, G. ;
Portugali, Y. .
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS, 2012, 214 (01) :481-518
[6]   How to strategize smart cities: Revealing the SMART model [J].
Ben Letaifa, Soumaya .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2015, 68 (07) :1414-1419
[7]   Smart Mobility in Smart City Action Taxonomy, ICT Intensity and Public Benefits [J].
Benevolo, Clara ;
Dameri, Renata Paola ;
D'Auria, Beatrice .
EMPOWERING ORGANIZATIONS: ENABLING PLATFORMS AND ARTEFACTS, 2016, 11 :13-28
[8]   Smart Cities in Europe [J].
Caragliu, Andrea ;
Del Bo, Chiara ;
Nijkamp, Peter .
JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 18 (02) :65-82
[9]   Where does carsharing work? Using geographic information systems to assess market potential [J].
Celsor, Christine ;
Millard-Ball, Adam .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2007, (1992) :61-69
[10]  
Clewlow R., 2017, UCD-ITS-RR-117-07