The Influence of Voice Sample Length in the Auditory-Perceptual Judgment of Overall Voice Quality

被引:19
作者
Barsties, Ben [1 ,2 ]
Maryn, Youri [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Hsch Fresenius Univ Appl Sci, Sch Med, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Sint Augustinus Hosp, European Inst ORL, Antwerp, Belgium
[4] Univ Coll Ghent, Fac Educ Hlth & Social Work, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Voice quality; Auditory; perceptual judgment; Sample length; Continuous speech; Sustained vowel; CEPSTRAL PEAK PROMINENCE; DYSPHONIA SEVERITY; LISTENER EXPERIENCE; GRBAS SCALE; RELIABILITY; STANDARDS; ANCHORS; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.07.006
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of voice sample lengths (VSLs) on the perceived degree of severity of overall voice quality. To increase a valid judgment in voice quality, a consistent rating is essential to estimate the presence and degree of severity of a voice. Methods. Three VSLs were defined by varying only the length of continuous speech followed by constant duration of 3 seconds of the mid-vowel portion sustained vowel [ a:]. VSL-1 contained 17 syllables as is used for the Acoustic Voice Quality Index by Maryn et al (2010). VSL-2 consisted of a customized length (ie, with a mean number of 35.5 syllables of the original text, which corresponds to 3 seconds of only-voiced segments in continuous speech). VSL-3 had 93 syllables, which represent a complete phonetically balanced text. An expert panel of five judges rated 100 voice samples with various degrees of hoarseness. In total, three sessions were achieved judging one VSL variant in one session of the 100 voice samples. Results. The results showed significant differences of auditory-perceptual judgment between VSL-1 and VSL-2 (U = -4.985, P = 0.000), and between VSL-1 and VSL-3 (U = -5.642, P = 0.000). However, judgments of VSL-2 and VSL-3 did not differ significantly (U = -1.785, P = 0.074). Conclusion. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the judgment of VSL-2 is comparable with the judgment of VSL-3. Therefore, speech material for clinical judgment can be reduced to VSL-2 for rating overall voice quality.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 210
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
[51]   Objective Assessment of Pediatric Voice Disorders With the Acoustic Voice Quality Index [J].
Reynolds, Victoria ;
Buckland, Ali ;
Bailey, Jean ;
Lipscombe, Jodi ;
Nathan, Elizabeth ;
Vijayasekaran, Shyan ;
Kelly, Rona ;
Maryn, Youri ;
French, Noel .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2012, 26 (05) :672.e1-672.e7
[52]   Development and validation of the Voice Handicap Index-10 [J].
Rosen, CA ;
Lee, AS ;
Osborne, J ;
Zullo, T ;
Murry, T .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2004, 114 (09) :1549-1556
[53]  
Shrivastav R., 2011, Handbook of voice assessments, P305
[54]   The Effect of Experience on Classification of Voice Quality [J].
Sofranko, Jessica L. ;
Prosek, Robert A. .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2012, 26 (03) :299-303
[55]  
Titze I.R., 1994, PRINCIPLES VOICE PRO, P252
[56]   TOWARD STANDARDS IN ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF VOICE [J].
TITZE, IR .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 1994, 8 (01) :1-7
[57]  
Van Belle S., 2009, THESIS
[58]  
Van DeWeijer J., 1991, Logopedie Foniatrie, V63, P97
[59]  
Van Lierde K., 2001, THESIS
[60]   Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia [J].
Wuyts, FL ;
De Bodt, MS ;
Van de Heyning, PH .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 1999, 13 (04) :508-517