The Political Economy of Biotechnology

被引:0
作者
Zilberman, David [1 ,4 ]
Graff, Gregory [2 ]
Hochman, Gal [3 ]
Kaplan, Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Coll Nat Resources, Berkeley, CA USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Coll Agr Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Rudgers Univ, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[4] Coll Nat Resources, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, 207 Gianni Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
GERMAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS | 2015年 / 64卷 / 04期
关键词
bioeconomy; behavioural economics; genetic engineering; political economy; regulation; AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGIES; REGULATIONS; CONSUMER; RISK;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The introduction of GE to agriculture has encountered strong resistance, reflecting conflicting groups within and between countries. This has resulted in a regulatory environment that has limited the application of GE mostly to feed and fiber and practically restricted its application in food. While agricultural biotechnology has already provided significant benefits, much of its potential has not been reached. Regulation of agricultural biotechnology reflects conflicting interests and varying political power of different groups. The relatively supportive regulation of biotechnology in the U.S. reflects that it is an American technology, and supporting groups like the farm lobby, technology manufacturers, and U.S. consumers outweigh the objections of environmentalists and other opposition to the technology. In Europe, growing concern about environmental side-effects of agriculture, the fact that GE technology was imported, and the power of environmental groups has resulted in restrictive regulation. To a large extent, the fate of GE depends on the level of goodwill it generates among voters, and as long as a large segment of the population is apprehensive about its benefits, heavy restrictions about the technology that prevent it from reaching its potential will persist.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 223
页数:12
相关论文
共 62 条
[11]   Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics, Environment, Ethics, and the Future [J].
Bennett, Alan B. ;
Chi-Ham, Cecilia ;
Barrows, Geoffrey ;
Sexton, Steven ;
Zilberman, David .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 38, 2013, 38 :249-279
[12]  
Bera RK, 2009, CURR SCI INDIA, V96, P760
[13]   Scientific cultures of non-knowledge in the controversy over genetically modified organisms (GMO) - The cases of molecular biology and ecology [J].
Boeschen, Stefan ;
Kastenhofer, Karen ;
Marschall, Luitgard ;
Rust, Ina ;
Soentgen, Jens ;
Wehling, Peter .
GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2006, 15 (04) :294-301
[14]  
CAIN C., 2013, SCIBX SCI BUSINESS E, V6
[15]  
Curtis Kynda R., 2008, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, V8, P77, DOI 10.1504/IJGENVI.2008.017261
[16]  
De Gorter H, 2002, HANDB ECON, V18, P1893
[17]  
DOUGLAS E., 2001, GUARDIAN
[18]   AN ECONOMIC-THEORY OF POLITICAL-ACTION IN A DEMOCRACY [J].
DOWNS, A .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1957, 65 (02) :135-150
[19]   Mad cows, mad corn and mad communities: the role of socio-cultural factors in the perceived risk of genetically-modified food [J].
Finucane, ML .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 2002, 61 (01) :31-37
[20]  
GRAFF G., 2014, OXFORD HDB FOOD POLI