Role of multiparametric 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance

被引:80
作者
Park, Bong H. [1 ]
Jeon, Hwang G. [1 ]
Choo, Seol H. [1 ]
Jeong, Byong C. [1 ]
Seo, Seong I. [1 ]
Jeon, Seong S. [1 ]
Choi, Han Y. [1 ]
Lee, Hyun M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Seoul 135710, South Korea
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; watchful waiting; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TUMOR; BIOPSY; AGGRESSIVENESS; LOCALIZATION; VALIDATION; PRIAS; MEN;
D O I
10.1111/bju.12423
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate predictors of more aggressive disease and the role of multiparametric 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in selecting patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance (AS). Patients and Methods We retrospectively assessed 298 patients with prostate cancer who met the Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) criteria, defined as T1c/T2, PSA level of 10ng/mL, PSA density (PSAD) of <0.2ng/mL2, Gleason score <7, and one or two positive biopsy cores. All patients underwent preoperative MRI, including T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, as well as radical prostatectomy (RP) between June 2005 and December 2011. Imaging results were correlated with pathological findings to evaluate the ability of MRI to select patients for AS. Results In 35 (11.7%) patients, no discrete cancer was visible on MRI, while in the remaining 263 (88.3%) patients, a discrete cancer was visible. Pathological examination of RP specimens resulted in upstaging (>T2) in 21 (7%) patients, upgrading (Gleason score >6) in 136 (45.6%), and a diagnosis of unfavourable disease in 142 (47.7%) patients. The 263 patients (88.3%) with visible cancer on imaging were more likely to have their cancer status upgraded (49.8% vs 14.3%) and be diagnosed with unfavourable disease (52.1% vs 14.3%) than the 35 patients (11.7%) with no cancer visible upon imaging, and these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001 for all). A visible cancer lesion on MRI, PSAD, and patient age were found to be predictors of unfavourable disease in multivariate analysis. Conclusion MRI can predict adverse pathological features and be used to assess the eligibility of patients with prostate cancer for AS.
引用
收藏
页码:864 / 870
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[2]   Pathological Upgrading and Up Staging With Immediate Repeat Biopsy in Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance [J].
Berglund, Ryan K. ;
Masterson, Timothy A. ;
Vora, Kinjal C. ;
Eggener, Scott E. ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Guillonneau, Bertrand D. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (05) :1964-1967
[3]   Prostate cancer: Is inapparent tumor at endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging a favorable prognostic finding in patients who select active surveillance? [J].
Cabrera, Alvin R. ;
Coakley, Fergus V. ;
Westphalen, Antonio C. ;
Lu, Ying ;
Zhao, Shoujun ;
Shinohara, Katsuto ;
Carroll, Peter R. ;
Kurhanewicz, John .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 247 (02) :444-450
[4]   Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Progress and Promise [J].
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Carroll, Peter R. ;
Klotz, Laurence .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (27) :3669-3676
[5]   Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer [J].
deSouza, N. M. ;
Riches, S. F. ;
VanAs, N. J. ;
Morgan, V. A. ;
Ashley, S. A. ;
Fisher, C. ;
Payne, G. S. ;
Parker, C. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 63 (07) :774-782
[6]   Analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (PRIAS) [J].
El Hajj, Albert ;
Ploussard, Guillaume ;
de la Taille, Alexandre ;
Allory, Yves ;
Vordos, Dimitri ;
Hoznek, Andras ;
Abbou, Claude Clement ;
Salomon, Laurent .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (01) :53-59
[7]   Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance: Role of Anatomic MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopic Imaging [J].
Fradet, Vincent ;
Kurhanewicz, John ;
Cowan, Janet E. ;
Karl, Alexander ;
Coakley, Fergus V. ;
Shinohara, Katsuto ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 256 (01) :176-183
[8]   Risk Stratification and Validation of Prostate Specific Antigen Density as Independent Predictor of Progression in Men With Low Risk Prostate Cancer During Active Surveillance [J].
Francisco, Ignacio F. San ;
Werner, Lillian ;
Regan, Meredith M. ;
Garnick, Marc B. ;
Bubley, Glenn ;
DeWolf, William C. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (02) :471-476
[9]   Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging [J].
Fuetterer, Jurgen J. ;
Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J. ;
Scheenen, Tom W. J. ;
Veltman, Jeroen ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
Vos, Pieter ;
Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Krabbe, Paul F. M. ;
Heerschap, Arend ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (02) :449-458
[10]   Endorectal T2-weighted MRI does not differentiate between favorable and adverse pathologic features in men with prostate cancer who would qualify for active surveillance [J].
Guzzo, Thomas J. ;
Resnick, Matthew J. ;
Canter, Daniel J. ;
Bivalacqua, Trinity J. ;
Rosen, Mark A. ;
Bergey, Meredith R. ;
Magerfleisch, Laurie ;
Tomazewski, John E. ;
Wein, Alan J. ;
Malkowicz, S. Bruce .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2012, 30 (03) :301-305