Conceptual model for improving the link between exposure and effects in the aquatic risk assessment of pesticides

被引:54
作者
Boesten, J. J. T. I.
Koepp, H.
Adriaanse, P. I.
Brock, T. C. M.
Forbes, V. E.
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Fed Off Consumer Protect & Food Safety, D-38104 Braunschweig, Germany
[3] Roskilde Univ, Dept Life Sci & Chem, Ctr Integrated Populat Ecol, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
aquatic ecotoxicology; surface water; exposure scenarios;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.10.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Assessment of risks to aquatic organisms is important in the registration procedures for pesticides in industrialised countries. This risk assessment consists of two parts: (i) assessment of effects to these organisms derived from ecotoxicological experiments (= effect assessment), and (ii) assessment of concentration levels in relevant environmental compartments resulting from pesticide application ( = exposure assessment). Current procedures lack a clear conceptual basis for the interface between the effect and exposure assessments which may lead to a low overall scientific quality of the risk assessment. This interface is defined here as the type of concentration that gives the best correlation to ecotoxicological effects and is called the ecotoxicologically relevant concentration (ERC). Definition of this ERC allows the design of tiered effect and exposure assessments that can interact flexibly and efficiently. There are two distinctly different exposure estimates required for pesticide risk assessment: that related to exposure in ecotoxicological experiments and that related to exposure in the field. The same type of ERC should be used consistently for both types of exposure estimates. Decisions are made by comparing a regulatory acceptable concentration ( = RAC) level or curve (i.e., endpoint of the effect assessment) with predicted environmental concentration (= PEC) levels or curves (endpoint of the exposure assessment). For decision making based on ecotoxicological experiments with time-variable concentrations a tiered approach is proposed that compares (i) in a first step single RAC and PEC levels based on conservative assumptions, (ii) in a second step graphically RAC and PEC curves (describing the time courses of the RAC and PEC), and (iii) in a third step time-weighted average RAC and PEC levels. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 308
页数:18
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Beltman W.H. J., 2006, Manual of FOCUS_TOXSWA version 2.2. 1(No. 586)
  • [2] Brock T. C. M., 2000, ECOLOGICAL RISKS PES
  • [3] Aquatic Risks of Pesticides, Ecological Protection Goals, and Common Aims in European Union Legislation
    Brock, Theo C. M.
    Arts, Gertie H. P.
    Maltby, Lorraine
    Van den Brink, Paul J.
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 2 (04) : E20 - E46
  • [4] Campbell P.J., 1999, SETAC EUROPE PUBLICA
  • [5] Fate of the herbicide linuron in outdoor experimental ditches
    Crum, SJH
    Aalderink, GH
    Brock, TCM
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 1998, 36 (10) : 2175 - 2190
  • [6] EFSA PPR Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues), 2005, EFSA J, V178, P1, DOI [10.2903/j.efsa.2005.178, DOI 10.2903/J.EFSA.2005.178]
  • [7] *EPA, 2004, AQUATIC LEV 2 REF RI, V4
  • [8] *EUR COMM, 2002, SANCO32682001REV4
  • [9] European Commission, 2002, SANCO103292002 EUR C
  • [10] *FOCUS, 2001, FOCUS WORKGR SURF WA