Plasma shape control assessment for JT-60SA using the CREATE tools

被引:12
作者
Corona, D. [1 ]
Cruz, N. [1 ]
De Tommasi, G. [2 ,3 ]
Fernandes, H. [1 ]
Joffrin, E. [4 ]
Mattei, M. [3 ,5 ]
Mele, A. [2 ,3 ]
Miyata, Y. [6 ]
Pironti, A. [2 ,3 ]
Suzuki, T. [6 ]
Urano, H. [6 ]
Villone, F. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Plasmas & Fusao Nucl, Inst Super Tecn, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Napoli Federico II, Dipartimento Ingn Elettr & Tecnol Informaz, Via Claudio 21, I-80125 Naples, Italy
[3] Consorzio CREATE, Via Claudio 21, I-80125 Naples, Italy
[4] CEA, IRFM, F-13108 St Paul Les Durance, France
[5] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dipartimento Ingn, Via Roma 29, I-80131 Aversa, CE, Italy
[6] Natl Inst Quantum & Radiol Sci & Technol, Naka Ku, Ibaraki 3110193, Japan
关键词
JT-60SA; Plasma magnetic control in Tokamak; Plasma shape control; Benchmarking; TOKAMAK; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.03.032
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
This paper deals with the plasma shape control problem in JT-60SA. An assessment of the plasma shape control performance is presented, aimed at the definition of an optimal set of gaps to be controlled. Indeed, JT-60SA represents a relevant benchmark to further validate this control approach given the high beta regimes that are envisaged during its operation. Moreover, such regimes represent a challenge from the plasma magnetic control perspective. The control approach considered for the assessment is based on the eXtreme Shape Controller (XSC), since such an approach permits to control, in a least mean square sense, a number of shape descriptors that is larger than the number of poloidal field coils. Considering that the design of the XSC is model-based, the CREATE linear model for the plasma-circuit response has been used for the design. In the presented analysis, the capability of tracking different plasma shapes, as well as the one of rejecting disturbances has been considered. The result of this analysis suggests that a set of about 20 gaps equally spaced along the plasma boundary permits to control the shape with a steady-state root-mean square error of less than 1 cm during the flattop of JT-60SA Scenario 2, in the presence of a set of relevant disturbances.
引用
收藏
页码:1773 / 1777
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   CREATE-NL plus : A robust control-oriented free boundary dynamic plasma equilibrium solver [J].
Albanese, R. ;
Ambrosino, R. ;
Mattei, M. .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2015, 96-97 :664-667
[2]   The linearized CREATE-L plasma response model for the control of current, position and shape in tokamaks [J].
Albanese, R ;
Villone, F .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 1998, 38 (05) :723-738
[3]  
Albanese R., P 2016 IEEE MULT SYS, P611
[4]   Design and Implementation of an Output Regulation Controller for the JET Tokamak [J].
Ambrosino, Giuseppe ;
Ariola, Marco ;
Pironti, Alfredo ;
Sartori, Filippo .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 16 (06) :1101-1111
[5]   A novel plasma position and shape controller for advanced configuration development on the TCV tokamak [J].
Anand, H. ;
Coda, S. ;
Felici, F. ;
Galperti, C. ;
Moret, J. -M. .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 2017, 57 (12)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Technical report
[7]   Plasma shape control for the JET Tokamak - An optimal output regulation approach [J].
Ariola, M ;
Pironti, A .
IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2005, 25 (05) :65-75
[8]   Control-oriented tools for the design and validation of the JT-60SA magnetic control system [J].
Cruz, N. ;
De Tommasi, G. ;
Mattei, M. ;
Mele, A. ;
Miyata, Y. ;
Pironti, A. ;
Suzuki, T. .
CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2017, 63 :81-90
[9]  
de la Luna E., 26 IAEA FUS EN C KYO
[10]   Shape Control with the eXtreme Shape Controller During Plasma Current Ramp-Up and Ramp-Down at the JET Tokamak [J].
De Tommasi, G. ;
Ambrosino, G. ;
Ariola, M. ;
Calabro, G. ;
Galeani, S. ;
Maviglia, F. ;
Pironti, A. ;
Rimini, F. G. ;
Sips, A. C. C. ;
Varano, G. ;
Vitelli, R. ;
Zaccarian, L. .
JOURNAL OF FUSION ENERGY, 2014, 33 (02) :149-157