Improved One-Shot Total Energies from the Linearized GW Density Matrix

被引:8
作者
Bruneval, Fabien [1 ]
Rodriguez-Mayorga, Mauricio [1 ]
Rinke, Patrick [2 ]
Dvorak, Marc [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, Serv Rech Met Phys, CEA, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France
[2] Aalto Univ, Dept Appl Phys, Sch Sci, Aalto 00076, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
PERTURBATION-THEORY; GREENS-FUNCTION; BASIS-SETS; MOLECULES; ATOMS; APPROXIMATION; CONSERVATION; POTENTIALS; CHEMISTRY; G(0)W(0);
D O I
10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01264
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The linearized GW density matrix (gamma(GW)) is an efficient method to improve the static portion of the self-energy compared to that of ordinary perturbative GW while keeping the single-shot simplicity of the calculation. Previous work has shown that.GW gives an improved Fock operator and total energy components that approach the self-consistent GW quality. Here, we test.GW for dimer dissociation for the first time by studying N-2, LiH, and Be-2. We also calculate a set of self-consistent GW results in identical basis sets for a direct and consistent comparison. gamma(GW) approaches self-consistent GW total energies for a starting point based on a high amount of exact exchange. We also compare the accuracy of different total energy functionals, which differ when evaluated with a non-self-consistent density or density matrix. While the errors in total energies among different functionals and starting points are small, the individual energy components show noticeable errors when compared to reference data. The energy component errors of gamma(GW) are smaller than functionals of the density and we suggest that the linearized GW density matrix is a route to improving total energy evaluations in the adiabatic connection framework.
引用
收藏
页码:2126 / 2136
页数:11
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model [J].
Adamo, C ;
Barone, V .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 110 (13) :6158-6170
[2]   Variational total energies from φ- and Ψ-derivable theories [J].
Almbladh, CO ;
Von Barth, U ;
Van Leeuwen, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS B, 1999, 13 (5-6) :535-541
[3]   The GW method [J].
Aryasetiawan, F ;
Gunnarsson, O .
REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS, 1998, 61 (03) :237-312
[4]   CONSERVATION LAWS AND CORRELATION FUNCTIONS [J].
BAYM, G ;
KADANOFF, LP .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1961, 124 (02) :287-+
[5]   SELF-CONSISTENT APPROXIMATIONS IN MANY-BODY SYSTEMS [J].
BAYM, G .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1962, 127 (04) :1391-&
[6]   First-principles GW calculations for fullerenes, porphyrins, phtalocyanine, and other molecules of interest for organic photovoltaic applications [J].
Blase, X. ;
Attaccalite, C. ;
Olevano, V. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2011, 83 (11)
[7]   GW and Bethe-Salpeter study of small water clusters [J].
Blase, Xavier ;
Boulanger, Paul ;
Bruneval, Fabien ;
Fernandez-Serra, Marivi ;
Duchemin, Ivan .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 144 (03)
[8]   Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals [J].
Blum, Volker ;
Gehrke, Ralf ;
Hanke, Felix ;
Havu, Paula ;
Havu, Ville ;
Ren, Xinguo ;
Reuter, Karsten ;
Scheffler, Matthias .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 180 (11) :2175-2196
[9]   Assessment of the Linearized GW Density Matrix for Molecules [J].
Bruneval, Fabien .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2019, 15 (07) :4069-4078
[10]   Improved density matrices for accurate molecular ionization potentials [J].
Bruneval, Fabien .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2019, 99 (04)