Pre-treatment verification of lung SBRT VMAT plans with delivery errors: Toward a better understanding of the gamma index analysis

被引:21
作者
Alharthi, Thahabah [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Pogson, Elise M. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Arumugam, Sankar [3 ,4 ,7 ]
Holloway, Lois [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Thwaites, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Phys, Inst Med Phys, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Taif Univ, Sch Med, At Taif, Saudi Arabia
[3] Liverpool Canc Therapy Ctr, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[4] Macarthur Canc Therapy Ctr, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[5] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[7] Univ New South Wales, South Western Sydney Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2018年 / 49卷
关键词
Lung SBRT VMAT; Gamma index; Delivery error; ArcCHECK; VOLUMETRIC-MODULATED ARC; STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY; ION-CHAMBER ARRAY; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIATION-THERAPY; SENSITIVITY; IMRT; DOSIMETRY; CANCER; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.04.005
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To study the sensitivity of the ArcCHECK in detecting delivery errors for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using the Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique and to evaluate the sensitivity of eight global and local gamma tolerances with different cut-off percentages. Methods: Baseline VMAT plans were generated for 15 lung SBRT patients. We delivered the smallest errors (gantry, collimator, and multileaf collimator MLC) which had >= +/- 2% dose difference in the modified treatment plans compared to the baseline plan (the clinical significance of those errors were assessed in our previous study. A total of 100 plan in which 15 baseline plans were measured using the ArcCheck detector along with ion chamber measurements. The sensitivity of the global and local gamma-index method using criteria of 1%/1 mm, 2%/1 mm, 2%/2 mm, and 3%/3 mm was investigated. Results: The gamma (gamma) pass rates for these plans exhibited considerable spread. The majority of simulated errors were not detected. Broadly similar detection levels were achieved with the different gamma criteria and cut-offs. Combining ion chamber measurements with ArcCHECK did not improve error detection. Conclusions: Commonly adopted gamma criteria are not sensitive enough to validate lung SBRT VMAT plans at the 2% dose difference level. The error detection levels are fairly consistent despite changes in gamma criteria and cut-offs. The choice of gamma criteria was not significant and there was no clear benefit in tightening the gamma criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 128
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P 13 WORLD C LUNG CA
[2]   Comparison of three commercial dosimetric systems in detecting clinically significant VMAT delivery errors [J].
Arumugam, Sankar ;
Xing, Aitang ;
Young, Tony ;
Thwaites, David ;
Holloway, Lois .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 32 (10) :1238-1244
[3]   Sensitivity of a helical diode array dosimeter to Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy delivery errors [J].
Arumugam, Sankar ;
Xing, Aitang ;
Young, Tony ;
Holloway, Lois .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 31 (08) :1043-1054
[4]   Stereotactic body radiation therapy: The report of AAPM Task Group 101 [J].
Benedict, Stanley H. ;
Yenice, Kamil M. ;
Followill, David ;
Galvin, James M. ;
Hinson, William ;
Kavanagh, Brian ;
Keall, Paul ;
Lovelock, Michael ;
Meeks, Sanford ;
Papiez, Lech ;
Purdie, Thomas ;
Sadagopan, Ramaswamy ;
Schell, Michael C. ;
Salter, Bill ;
Schlesinger, David J. ;
Shiu, Almon S. ;
Solberg, Timothy ;
Song, Danny Y. ;
Stieber, Volker ;
Timmerman, Robert ;
Tome, Wolfgang A. ;
Verellen, Dirk ;
Wang, Lu ;
Yin, Fang-Fang .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (08) :4078-4101
[5]   Investigating the impact of treatment delivery uncertainties on treatment effectiveness for lung SABR [J].
Blake, Samuel J. ;
Arumugam, Sankar ;
Holloway, Lois ;
Vinod, Shalini ;
Ochoa, Cesar ;
Phan, Penny ;
Hansen, Christian Ronn ;
Thwaites, David I. .
AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2017, 40 (04) :823-829
[6]   How the detector resolution affects the clinical significance of SBRT pre-treatment quality assurance results [J].
Bruschi, A. ;
Esposito, M. ;
Pini, S. ;
Ghirelli, A. ;
Zatelli, G. ;
Russo, S. .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 49 :129-134
[7]   IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119 [J].
Ezzell, Gary A. ;
Burmeister, Jay W. ;
Dogan, Nesrin ;
LoSasso, Thomas J. ;
Mechalakos, James G. ;
Mihailidis, Dimitris ;
Molineu, Andrea ;
Palta, Jatinder R. ;
Ramsey, Chester R. ;
Salter, Bill J. ;
Shi, Jie ;
Xia, Ping ;
Yue, Ning J. ;
Xiao, Ying .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11) :5359-5373
[8]   Evaluation of a new VMAT QA device, or the "X" and "O" array geometries [J].
Feygelman, Vladimir ;
Zhang, Geoffrey ;
Stevens, Craig ;
Nelms, Benjamin E. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 12 (02) :146-168
[9]   Patient QA systems for rotational radiation therapy: A comparative experimental study with intentional errors [J].
Fredh, Anna ;
Scherman, Jonas Bengtsson ;
Fog, Lotte S. ;
Af Rosenschold, Per Munck .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (03)
[10]   A cine-EPID based method for jaw detection and quality assurance for tracking jaw in IMRT/VMAT treatments [J].
Fuangrod, Todsaporn ;
Rowshanfarzad, Pejman ;
Greer, Peter B. ;
Middleton, Richard H. .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 31 (01) :16-36