Postabortion Contraceptive Use and Continuation When Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Is Free

被引:25
作者
Goyal, Vinita [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Canfield, Caitlin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Aiken, Abigail R. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dermish, Amna [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Potter, Joseph E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Populat Res Ctr, 305 E 23rd St,Stop G1800, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, LBJ Sch Publ Affairs, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Planned Parenthood Greater Texas, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTION; REPEAT ABORTION; WOMEN; INSERTION; SERVICES; BARRIERS; TEXAS; PROVISION; PLACEMENT; IMPLANT;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000001926
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare preference for long-acting contraception (LARC) and subsequent use, year-long continuation, and pregnancy among women after induced abortion who were and were not eligible to participate in a specialized funding program that provided LARC at no cost. METHODS: Between October 2014 and March 2016, we conducted a prospective study of abortion patients at Planned Parenthood in Austin, Texas (located in Travis County). We compared our primary outcome of interest, postabortion LARC use, among women who were eligible for the specialized funding program (low-income, uninsured, Travis County residents) and two groups who were ineligible (low-income, uninsured, non-Travis County residents, and higher income or insured women). Secondary outcomes of interest included preabortion preference for LARC and 1-year continuation and pregnancy rates among the three groups. RESULTS: Among 518 women, preabortion preference for LARC was high among all three groups (low-income eligible: 64%[91/143]; low-income ineligible: 44% [49/112]; and higher income 55% [146/263]). However, lowincome eligible participants were more likely to receive LARC (65% [93/143] compared with 5% [6/112] and 24% [62/263], respectively, P<.05). Specifically, after adjusting for age, race-ethnicity, and education, low-income eligible participants had a 10-fold greater incidence of receiving postabortion LARC compared with low-income ineligible participants (incidence rate ratio 10.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.68-21.91). Among lowincome eligible and higher income women who received postabortion LARC, 1-year continuation was 90% (95% CI 82-97%) and 86% (95% CI 76-97%), respectively. One-year pregnancy risk was higher among lowincome ineligible than low-income eligible women (hazard ratio 3.28, 95% CI 1.15-9.31). CONCLUSION: Preference for postabortion LARC was high among all three eligibility groups, yet women with access to no-cost LARC were more likely to use and continue these methods. Low-income ineligible women were far more likely to use less effective contraception and become pregnant. Specialized funding programs can play an important role in immediate postabortion contraceptive provision, particularly in settings where state funding is limited.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 662
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Preventing repeat abortion in Canada: is the immediate insertion of intrauterine devices postabortion a cost-effective option associated with fewer repeat abortions? [J].
Ames, Christina M. ;
Norman, Wendy V. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 85 (01) :51-55
[2]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, EFF FAM PLANN METHO
[3]   Does the provision of free intrauterine contraception reduce pregnancy rates among uninsured low-income women? A cohort study a two North Carolina clinics [J].
Fanarjian, Nicole ;
Drostin, Christina ;
Garrett, Joanne ;
Montalvo, Arlin .
CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 85 (02) :160-165
[4]   A comparison of depression and anxiety symptom trajectories between women who had an abortion and women denied one [J].
Foster, D. G. ;
Steinberg, J. R. ;
Roberts, S. C. M. ;
Neuhaus, J. ;
Biggs, M. A. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2015, 45 (10) :2073-2082
[5]  
Gariepy Aileen M, 2011, Contraception, V84, pe39, DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.002
[6]   Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion [J].
Goodman, Suzan ;
Hendlish, Sarah K. ;
Reeves, Matthew F. ;
Foster-Rosales, Anne .
CONTRACEPTION, 2008, 78 (02) :143-148
[7]   Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas [J].
Grossman, Daniel ;
Baum, Sarah ;
Fuentes, Liza ;
White, Kari ;
Hopkins, Kristine ;
Stevenson, Amanda ;
Potter, Joseph E. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 90 (05) :496-501
[8]  
Jones R.K., 2006, REPEAT ABORTION US
[9]   Perceived and Insurance-Related Barriers to the Provision of Contraceptive Services in US Abortion Care Settings [J].
Kavanaugh, Megan L. ;
Jones, Rachel K. ;
Finer, Lawrence B. .
WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2011, 21 (03) :S26-S31
[10]   Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project [J].
Madden, Tessa ;
Mullersman, Jennifer L. ;
Omvig, Karen J. ;
Secura, Gina M. ;
Peipert, Jeffrey F. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 88 (02) :243-249