Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation

被引:35
作者
Handsfield, Lydia L. [1 ]
Jones, Ryan [1 ]
Wilson, David D. [1 ]
Siebers, Jeffery V. [1 ]
Read, Paul W. [1 ]
Chen, Quan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
关键词
log file; quality assurance; TomoTherapy; phantomless; Monte Carlo; IMRT QUALITY-ASSURANCE; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; PASSING RATES; LOG FILES; VERIFICATION; TOOL; RECONSTRUCTION; IMPLEMENTATION; VALIDATION; DOSIMETRY;
D O I
10.1118/1.4894721
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the validation and implementation of a novel quality assurance (QA) system for TomoTherapy using a Monte Carlo (MC)-based secondary dose calculation and CT detector-based multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf opening time measurement QA verification. This system is capable of detecting plan transfer and delivery errors and evaluating the dosimetric impact of those errors. Methods: The authors' QA process, MCLogQA, utilizes an independent pretreatment MC secondary dose calculation and postdelivery TomoTherapy exit detector-based MLC sinogram comparison and log file examination to confirm accurate dose calculation, accurate dose delivery, and to verify machine performance. MC radiation transport simulations are performed to estimate patient dose utilizing prestored treatment machine-specific phase-space information, the patient's planning CT, and MLC sinogram data. Sinogram data are generated from both the treatment planning system (MC_TPS) and from beam delivery log files (MC_Log). TomoTherapy treatment planning dose (D-TPS) is compared with D-MC_TPS and D-MC_Log via dose-volume metrics and mean region of interest dose statistics. For validation, in-phantom ionization chamber dose measurements (D-IC) for ten sample patient plans are compared with the computed values. Results: Dose comparisons to in-phantom ion chamber measurements validate the capability of the MCLogQA method to detect delivery errors. D-MC_Log agreed with D-IC within 1%, while D-TPS values varied by 2%-5% compared to D-IC. The authors demonstrated that TomoTherapy treatments can be vulnerable to MLC deviations and interfraction output variations during treatment delivery. Interfractional Linac output variations for each patient were approximately 2% and average output was 1%-1.5% below the gold standard. While average MLC leaf opening time error from patient to patient varied from -0.6% to 1.6%, the MLC leaf errors varied little between fractions for the same patient plan, excluding one patient. Conclusions: MCLogQA is a new TomoTherapy QA process that validates the planned dose before delivery and analyzes the delivered dose using the treatment exit detector and log file data. The MCLogQA procedure is an effective and efficient alternative to traditional phantom-based TomoTherapy plan-specific QA because it allows for comprehensive 3D dose verification, accounts for tissue heterogeneity, uses patient CT density tables, reduces total QA time, and provides for a comprehensive QA methodology for each treatment fraction. (C) 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [11] Cloud-Based Monte Carlo Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (QA) Method for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
    Chen, X.
    Xing, L.
    Azcona, J.
    Luxton, G.
    Bush, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 237 - 238
  • [12] Patient-specific QA using 4D Monte Carlo phase space predictions and EPID dosimetry
    Popescu, I. A.
    Atwal, P.
    Lobo, J.
    Lucido, J.
    McCurdy, B. M. C.
    8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 3D RADIATION DOSIMETRY (IC3DDOSE), 2015, 573
  • [13] Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA
    Ahmad, Munir
    Deng, Jun
    Lund, Molly W.
    Chen, Zhe
    Kimmett, James
    Moran, Meena S.
    Nath, Ravinder
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (02) : 447 - 465
  • [14] PATIENT-SPECIFIC 3D PRETREATMENT AND POTENTIAL 3D ONLINE DOSE VERIFICATION OF MONTE CARLO-CALCULATED IMRT PROSTATE TREATMENT PLANS
    Boggula, Ramesh
    Jahnke, Lennart
    Wertz, Hansjoerg
    Lohr, Frank
    Wenz, Frederik
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (04): : 1168 - 1175
  • [15] Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography
    Deak, Paul
    van Straten, Marcel
    Shrimpton, Paul C.
    Zankl, Maria
    Kalender, Willi A.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (04) : 759 - 772
  • [16] Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography
    Paul Deak
    Marcel van Straten
    Paul C. Shrimpton
    Maria Zankl
    Willi A. Kalender
    European Radiology, 2008, 18 : 759 - 772
  • [17] Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: Part I. Development and validation of a Monte Carlo program
    Li, Xiang
    Samei, Ehsan
    Segars, W. Paul
    Sturgeon, Gregory M.
    Colsher, James G.
    Toncheva, Greta
    Yoshizumi, Terry T.
    Frush, Donald P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (01) : 397 - 407
  • [18] Treatment plan prescreening for patient-specific quality assurance measurements using independent Monte Carlo dose calculations
    Xu, Yuan
    Zhang, Ke
    Liu, Zhiqiang
    Liang, Bin
    Ma, Xiangyu
    Ren, Wenting
    Men, Kuo
    Dai, Jianrong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [19] PATIENT-SPECIFIC MONTE CARLO-BASED DOSE-KERNEL APPROACH FOR INVERSE PLANNING IN AFTERLOADING BRACHYTHERAPY
    D'Amours, Michel
    Pouliot, Jean
    Dagnault, Anne
    Verhaegen, Frank
    Beaulieu, Luc
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (05): : 1582 - 1589
  • [20] Monte Carlo simulation-based patient-specific QA using machine log files for line-scanning proton radiation therapy
    Jeon, Chanil
    Lee, Jinhyeop
    Shin, Jungwook
    Cheon, Wonjoong
    Ahn, Sunghwan
    Jo, Kwanghyun
    Han, Youngyih
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (11) : 7139 - 7153