Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation

被引:35
作者
Handsfield, Lydia L. [1 ]
Jones, Ryan [1 ]
Wilson, David D. [1 ]
Siebers, Jeffery V. [1 ]
Read, Paul W. [1 ]
Chen, Quan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
关键词
log file; quality assurance; TomoTherapy; phantomless; Monte Carlo; IMRT QUALITY-ASSURANCE; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; PASSING RATES; LOG FILES; VERIFICATION; TOOL; RECONSTRUCTION; IMPLEMENTATION; VALIDATION; DOSIMETRY;
D O I
10.1118/1.4894721
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the validation and implementation of a novel quality assurance (QA) system for TomoTherapy using a Monte Carlo (MC)-based secondary dose calculation and CT detector-based multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf opening time measurement QA verification. This system is capable of detecting plan transfer and delivery errors and evaluating the dosimetric impact of those errors. Methods: The authors' QA process, MCLogQA, utilizes an independent pretreatment MC secondary dose calculation and postdelivery TomoTherapy exit detector-based MLC sinogram comparison and log file examination to confirm accurate dose calculation, accurate dose delivery, and to verify machine performance. MC radiation transport simulations are performed to estimate patient dose utilizing prestored treatment machine-specific phase-space information, the patient's planning CT, and MLC sinogram data. Sinogram data are generated from both the treatment planning system (MC_TPS) and from beam delivery log files (MC_Log). TomoTherapy treatment planning dose (D-TPS) is compared with D-MC_TPS and D-MC_Log via dose-volume metrics and mean region of interest dose statistics. For validation, in-phantom ionization chamber dose measurements (D-IC) for ten sample patient plans are compared with the computed values. Results: Dose comparisons to in-phantom ion chamber measurements validate the capability of the MCLogQA method to detect delivery errors. D-MC_Log agreed with D-IC within 1%, while D-TPS values varied by 2%-5% compared to D-IC. The authors demonstrated that TomoTherapy treatments can be vulnerable to MLC deviations and interfraction output variations during treatment delivery. Interfractional Linac output variations for each patient were approximately 2% and average output was 1%-1.5% below the gold standard. While average MLC leaf opening time error from patient to patient varied from -0.6% to 1.6%, the MLC leaf errors varied little between fractions for the same patient plan, excluding one patient. Conclusions: MCLogQA is a new TomoTherapy QA process that validates the planned dose before delivery and analyzes the delivered dose using the treatment exit detector and log file data. The MCLogQA procedure is an effective and efficient alternative to traditional phantom-based TomoTherapy plan-specific QA because it allows for comprehensive 3D dose verification, accounts for tissue heterogeneity, uses patient CT density tables, reduces total QA time, and provides for a comprehensive QA methodology for each treatment fraction. (C) 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Monte Carlo calculation of helical tomotherapy dose delivery
    Zhao, Ying-Li
    Mackenzie, M.
    Kirkby, C.
    Fallone, B. G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (08) : 3491 - 3500
  • [2] A patient-specific Monte Carlo dose-calculation method for photon beams
    Wang, L
    Chui, CS
    Lovelock, M
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (06) : 867 - 878
  • [3] Commissioning and clinical implementation of the first commercial independent Monte Carlo 3D dose calculation to replace CyberKnife M6™ patient-specific QA measurements
    Milder, Maaike T. W.
    Alber, Markus
    Soehn, Matthias
    Hoogeman, Mischa S.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (11): : 304 - 311
  • [4] Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Using Monte Carlo Dose Calculation and Elekta Log Files for Prostate Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy
    Katsuta, Yoshiyuki
    Kadoya, Noriyuki
    Fujita, Yukio
    Shimizu, Eiji
    Matsunaga, Kenichi
    Sawada, Kinya
    Matsushita, Haruo
    Majima, Kazuhiro
    Jingu, Keiichi
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2017, 16 (06) : 1220 - 1225
  • [5] Patient-specific Monte Carlo dose calculations for 103Pd breast brachytherapy
    Miksys, N.
    Cygler, J. E.
    Caudrelier, J. M.
    Thomson, R. M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (07) : 2705 - 2729
  • [6] Automatic, Patient-Specific, Monte Carlo Based IMRT QA, without Ionization Chamber or Film
    Popescu, I. A.
    Bergman, A. M.
    Kwa, W.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2006, VOL 14, PTS 1-6, 2007, 14 : 1801 - 1803
  • [7] Evaluation of 4-Hz log files and secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation as patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT prostate plans
    Szeverinski, Philipp
    Kowatsch, Matthias
    Kunzler, Thomas
    Meinschad, Marco
    Clemens, Patrick
    DeVries, Alexander F.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (07): : 235 - 244
  • [8] Patient-specific dose assessment using CBCT images and Monte Carlo calculations
    Aghaz, A.
    Kardan, M. R.
    Deevband, M. R.
    Bahadorzadeh, B.
    Kasesaz, Y.
    Ghadiri, H.
    JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2021, 16 (10)
  • [9] Fast patient-specific Monte Carlo brachytherapy dose calculations via the correlated sampling variance reduction technique
    Sampson, Andrew
    Le, Yi
    Williamson, Jeffrey F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (02) : 1058 - 1068
  • [10] A real time dose monitoring and dose reconstruction tool for patient specific VMAT QA and delivery
    Tyagi, Neelam
    Yang, Kai
    Gersten, David
    Yan, Di
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (12) : 7194 - 7204