Optimal cycle of intermittent portal triad clamping during liver resection in the murine liver

被引:18
作者
Kang, KJ
Jang, JH
Lim, TJ
Kang, Y
Park, KK
Lee, IS
Clavien, PA
机构
[1] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Taegu 700712, South Korea
[2] Keimyung Univ, Dept Pathol, Taegu 700712, South Korea
[3] Keimyung Univ, Sch Med, Taegu 700712, South Korea
[4] Keimyung Univ, TMR Ctr, Inst Med Sci, Taegu 700712, South Korea
[5] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Visceral & Transplantat Surg, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1002/lt.20177
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
We designed this experimental study to determine the optimal cycle for intermittent inflow occlusion during liver resection. A cycle of intermittent clamping (IC) for 15 minutes of ischemia followed by reperfusion for 5 minutes during liver resection is currently the most popular protocol used by experienced liver centers. As each period of reperfusion is associated with bleeding, longer periods of clamping would be advantageous. However, the longest safe duration of successive ischemia is unknown. Three groups of mice were subjected to a total liver ischemic period for 90 minutes; 2 groups underwent IC for 15 or 30 minutes, respectively, followed by 5 minutes of reperfusion, while the control group was subjected to continuous inflow occlusion only. The degree of tissue injury was assessed using biochemical and histological markers, as well as animal survival. While serious injury was observed in the continuous clamping group, both IC groups were associated with minimal injury, including lesser degrees of apoptosis and necrosis. All animals survived in the IC groups, while all animals died following 90 minutes of continuous inflow occlusion. In conclusion, intermittent portal pedicle clamping with 15- or 30-minute cycles is highly protective. A period of 30 minutes clamping should be preferred, since this would decrease the amount of blood loss associated with each cycle. This data should be confirmed in humans, and may represent a change in the current practice of hepatic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 801
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Arai N, 2001, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V7, P292
[2]   Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection -: A controlled study [J].
Belghiti, J ;
Noun, R ;
Malafosse, R ;
Jagot, P ;
Sauvanet, A ;
Pierangeli, F ;
Marty, J ;
Farges, O .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 229 (03) :369-375
[3]   Interleukin-6 protects liver against warm ischemia/reperfusion injury and promotes hepatocyte proliferation in the rodent [J].
Camargo, CA ;
Madden, JF ;
Gao, WS ;
Selvan, RS ;
Clavien, PA .
HEPATOLOGY, 1997, 26 (06) :1513-1520
[4]   A prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients undergoing major liver resection with versus without ischemic preconditioning [J].
Clavien, PA ;
Selzner, M ;
Rüdiger, HA ;
Graf, RF ;
Kadry, Z ;
Rousson, V ;
Jochum, WF .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 238 (06) :843-850
[5]   Sinusoidal endothelial cell injury during hepatic preservation and reperfusion [J].
Clavien, PA .
HEPATOLOGY, 1998, 28 (02) :281-285
[6]   Protective effects of ischemic preconditioning for liver resection performed under inflow occlusion in humans [J].
Clavien, PA ;
Yadav, S ;
Sindram, D ;
Bentley, RC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (02) :155-162
[7]   A caspase inhibitor fully protects rats against lethal normothermic liver ischemia by inhibition of liver apoptosis [J].
Cursio, R ;
Gugenheim, J ;
Ricci, JE ;
Crenesse, D ;
Rostagno, P ;
Maulon, L ;
Saint-Paul, MC ;
Ferrua, B ;
Auberger, P .
FASEB JOURNAL, 1999, 13 (02) :253-261
[8]  
EKBERG H, 1986, SURGERY, V100, P1
[9]   Apoptosis of sinusoidal endothelial cells is a critical mechanism of preservation injury in rat liver transplantation [J].
Gao, WS ;
Bentley, RC ;
Madden, JF ;
Clavien, PA .
HEPATOLOGY, 1998, 27 (06) :1652-1660
[10]   Mechanism of cell death during warm hepatic ischemia-reperfusion in rats: Apoptosis or necrosis? [J].
Gujral, JS ;
Bucci, TJ ;
Farhood, A ;
Jaeschke, H .
HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 33 (02) :397-405