General surgery residency interviews: are we following best practices?

被引:26
作者
Kim, Roger H. [1 ]
Gilbert, Timothy [2 ]
Suh, Sookyung [3 ]
Miller, Janet Karen [1 ]
Eggerstedt, Jane M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Surg, Hlth Sci Ctr Shreveport, Shreveport, LA 71130 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Off Acad Affairs, Hlth Sci Ctr Shreveport, Shreveport, LA 71130 USA
[3] PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, New York, NY USA
关键词
Residency interview; Resident selection; Undergraduate medical education; Graduate medical education; General surgery residency; Medical students; A-SURVEY; SELECTION; ATTRITION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.10.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The interview is one of the most important factors in selecting candidates for general surgery residency. There is significant research on best practices for conducting interviews. Blinded interviews and standardized questions improve interview utility and accuracy; however, their utilization in surgical residency programs is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the current practices of surgery residency programs in the interview process and the application of established best practices. METHODS: An online survey consisting of 26 questions was distributed to program directors of accredited surgery residency programs in the United States and Canada. RESULTS: Overall, 108 responses (40%) were received. The vast majority of programs (90%) reported basing at least 25% of their final ranking on the interview score. Only 22 (20%) programs reported using some form of blinding for their interviewers. Five programs (5%) reported using standardized interview questions. CONCLUSIONS: Few residency programs use blinded interviews or standardized questions. This may indicate a gap between research findings and practice and may represent an area for improvement in the resident selection process. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:476 / U217
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The Predictive Value of General Surgery Application Data for Future Resident Performance [J].
Alterman, Daniel Mark ;
Jones, Thomas M. ;
Heidel, Robert E. ;
Daley, Brian J. ;
Goldman, Mitchell H. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2011, 68 (06) :513-525
[2]  
Brothers Thomas E, 2007, J Surg Educ, V64, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.05.003
[3]   A review of structure in the selection interview [J].
Campion, MA ;
Palmer, DK ;
Campion, JE .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 50 (03) :655-702
[4]   STRUCTURED INTERVIEWING - RAISING THE PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW [J].
CAMPION, MA ;
PURSELL, ED ;
BROWN, BK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 41 (01) :25-42
[5]  
Dipboye R.L., 1982, Academy of Management Review, V7, P579
[6]   An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview [J].
Eva, KW ;
Rosenfeld, J ;
Reiter, HI ;
Norman, GR .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2004, 38 (03) :314-326
[7]   General surgery resident attrition and the 80-hour workweek [J].
Everett, Christopher B. ;
Helmer, Stephen D. ;
Osland, Jacqueline S. ;
Smith, R. Stephen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 194 (06) :751-757
[8]  
Farley D R, 2001, Curr Surg, V58, P587, DOI 10.1016/S0149-7944(01)00493-7
[9]   Evaluating resident candidates: does closed file review impact faculty ratings? [J].
Hauge, Linnea S. ;
Stroessner, Steven J. ;
Chowdhry, Shahnaz ;
Wool, Norman L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 193 (06) :761-765
[10]   How Prevalent Are Potentially Illegal Questions During Residency Interviews? [J].
Hern, H. Gene, Jr. ;
Alter, Harrison J. ;
Wills, Charlotte P. ;
Snoey, Eric R. ;
Simon, Barry C. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2013, 88 (08) :1116-1121