Exploring HVAC system sizing under uncertainty

被引:127
作者
Sun, Yuming [1 ]
Gu, Li [2 ]
Wu, C. F. Jeff [2 ]
Augenbroe, Godfried [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Architecture, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
HVAC system sizing; Uncertainty quantification; Sensitivity analysis; Building energy; Probabilistic prediction; Safety factor; ENERGY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.06.026
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In current practice, HVAC systems are sized based on standardized procedures that were mostly developed by ASHRAE. The standard approach only implicitly deals with uncertainty in peak system demand through the selection of an appropriate design day and the choice of a safety factor. Although this method works satisfactorily in most cases, it offers no support to a system designer who wants to track the risk associated with an undersized system. The opposite, i.e. avoiding that the system is needlessly oversized deserves even more attention given the fact that current practice of "defensive sizing" leads to oversized systems which leads to wasted capital investment and systems that operate far away from the optimum efficiency loads. This paper explores a new framework to guide the use of uncertainty analysis (UA) and sensitivity analysis (SA) in HVAC system sizing. UA will replace the safety factor with quantified margins based on comprehensive quantification of different sources of uncertainty. A probabilistic-based SA is then used to identify the important individual factors or groups of factors that contribute to uncertainty, providing means of risk management by applying better quality assurance methods or negotiating performance contracts. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 252
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[31]   A stochastic model based energy management system for off-grid solar houses [J].
Hu, Huafen ;
Augenbroe, Godfried .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 50 :90-103
[32]   Monte-Carlo based uncertainty analysis: Sampling efficiency and sampling convergence [J].
Janssen, Hans .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 109 :123-132
[33]  
Lee B.D., 2012, FRAMEWORK GENERATING, P345
[34]  
Lee BD, 2013, BUILDING SIMULATION 2013: 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION ASSOCIATION, P1231
[35]   Field measurement of albedo for different land cover materials and effects on thermal performance [J].
Li, H. ;
Harvey, J. ;
Kendall, A. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 59 :536-546
[36]   Practical application of uncertainty analysis [J].
Macdonald, I ;
Strachan, P .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2001, 33 (03) :219-227
[37]  
Mandavi A., 2009, P INT IBPSA C GLASG
[38]   A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR SELECTING VALUES OF INPUT VARIABLES IN THE ANALYSIS OF OUTPUT FROM A COMPUTER CODE [J].
MCKAY, MD ;
BECKMAN, RJ ;
CONOVER, WJ .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1979, 21 (02) :239-245
[39]  
NOAA, 2014, NAT CLIM DAT
[40]  
O'Connor P., 2011, Practical reliability engineering