Intelligence and childlessness

被引:22
作者
Kanazawa, Satoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Management, Managerial Econ & Strategy Grp, London WC2A 2AE, England
关键词
Value for children; Parenthood; Childlessness; General intelligence; Savanna-IQ Interaction Hypothesis; The Lynn-Flynn Effect; UNITED-STATES; INTERGENERATIONAL TRANSMISSION; VOLUNTARY CHILDLESSNESS; GENERAL INTELLIGENCE; AMERICAN FERTILITY; GENDER DIFFERENCES; X-CHROMOSOME; DANISH TWIN; 1ST BIRTH; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.003
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Demographers debate why people have children in advanced industrial societies where children are net economic costs. From an evolutionary perspective, however, the important question is why some individuals choose not to have children. Recent theoretical developments in evolutionary psychology suggest that more intelligent individuals may be more likely to prefer to remain childless than less intelligent individuals. Analyses of the National Child Development Study show that more intelligent men and women express preference to remain childless early in their reproductive careers, but only more intelligent women (not more intelligent men) are more likely to remain childless by the end of their reproductive careers. Controlling for education and earnings does not at all attenuate the association between childhood general intelligence and lifetime childlessness among Women. One-standard-deviation increase in childhood general intelligence (15 IQ points) decreases women's odds of parenthood by 21-25%. Because women have a greater impact on the average intelligence of future generations, the dysgenic fertility among women is predicted to lead to a decline in the average intelligence of the population in advanced industrial nations. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 170
页数:14
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]  
Alexander R. D., 1979, EVOLUTIONARY BIOL HU, P402
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, The g factor
[4]  
Atran Scott., 2002, GODS WE TRUST EVOLUT
[5]   Ideational influences on the transition to parenthood: Attitudes toward childbearing and competing alternatives [J].
Barber, JS .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2001, 64 (02) :101-127
[6]   THE FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS OF HUMAN-FERTILITY DECISIONS [J].
BEAUCHAMP, G .
ETHOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1994, 15 (01) :31-53
[7]  
BEAUJEAN AA, 2006, SCH PSYCHOL, V60, P17
[8]  
Becker G, 1960, An economic analysis of fertility, V22, P209, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01856705
[9]  
Becker G., 1991, A treatise on the family
[10]  
Blake Judith, 1968, POPULATION STUDIES, V22, P5