Induction characteristics of thiopentone/suxamethonium, propofol/alfentanil or halothane alone in children aged 1-3 years

被引:15
作者
Annila, P [1 ]
Viitanen, H [1 ]
Reinikainen, P [1 ]
Baer, G [1 ]
Lindgren, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tampere, Sch Med, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
关键词
anaesthesia; paediatric; tracheal intubation; cardiac dysrhythmias;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00484.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of three different induction techniques, with or without neuromuscular block, on tracheal intubation, haemodynamic responses and cardiac rhythm. Ninety children, aged 1-3 years, undergoing day-case adenoidectomy were randomly allocated to three groups: group TS received thiopentone 5 mg kg(-1) and suxamethonium 1.5 mg kg(-1), group H 5 Vol.% halothane and group PA alfentanil 10 mu g kg(-1) and propofol 3 mg kg(-1) for induction of anaesthesia. No anticholinergics were used. Holter-monitoring of the heart rate and rhythm was started at least 15 min before induction of anaesthesia and continued until 3 min after intubation. Tracheal intubation was performed by an anaesthetist blinded to the induction method and judged as excellent, moderate or poor according to ease of laryngoscopy, position of vocal cords and incidence of coughing after intubation. Tracheal intubation was successful at the first attempt in all children in groups TS and H and but only in 80% in group PA (P=0.001). Intubating conditions were excellent in 22 (73%), 22 (73%) and one (3%) of the patients in groups TS, H and PA, respectively (P=0.001). Cardiac dysrhythmias (supraventricular extrasystole or junctional rhythm) occurred in two (7%) patients in groups PA and H each (NS). Bradycardia occurred in 0 (0%), four (14%) and six (21%) children in groups TS, H and PA, respectively (P=0.007 PA vs.TS, P=0.03 H vs. TS). In conclusion, induction of anaesthesia with propofol 3 mg kg(-1) and alfentanil 10 mu g kg(-1) without neuromuscular block did not provide acceptable intubating conditions in children 1-3 years, although it preserved arterial pressure better than thiopentone/suxamethonium or halothane. Cardiac dysrhythmias were few regardless of the induction method.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 366
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   PROPOFOL ANESTHESIA IN PEDIATRIC AMBULATORY PATIENTS - A COMPARISON WITH THIOPENTONE AND HALOTHANE [J].
HANNALLAH, RS ;
BRITTON, JT ;
SCHAFER, PG ;
PATEL, RI ;
NORDEN, JM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1994, 41 (01) :12-18
[12]  
HELBOHANSEN S, 1988, ACTA ANAESTH SCAND, V32, P41
[13]   INJECTION PAIN, CARDIOVASCULAR CHANGES AND RECOVERY FOLLOWING INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL IN COMBINATION WITH ALFENTANIL OR LIGNOCAINE IN CHILDREN [J].
HILLER, A ;
SAARNIVAARA, L .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 36 (06) :564-568
[14]   TRACHEAL INTUBATION AFTER INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL, ALFENTANIL AND LIDOCAINE WITHOUT NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING-DRUGS IN CHILDREN [J].
HILLER, A ;
KLEMOLA, UM ;
SAARNIVAARA, L .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 37 (08) :725-729
[15]   Dose-response relationship and effective time to satisfactory intubation conditions after rocuronium in children [J].
Hopkinson, JM ;
Meakin, G ;
McCluskey, A ;
Baker, RD .
ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 52 (05) :428-432
[16]   HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSES AND PROLONGATION OF QT INTERVAL OF ECG AFTER SUXAMETHONIUM-FACILITATED INTUBATION DURING ANESTHETIC INDUCTION IN CHILDREN - A DOSE-RELATED ATTENUATION BY ALFENTANIL [J].
LINDGREN, L ;
RAUTIAINEN, P ;
KLEMOLA, UM ;
SAARNIVAARA, L .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1991, 35 (04) :355-358
[17]  
LINDGREN L, 1987, EUR J ANAESTH, V4, P229
[18]   CARDIOVASCULAR-RESPONSES TO TRACHEAL INTUBATION IN SMALL CHILDREN - EFFECTS OF THE INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH HALOTHANE [J].
LINDGREN, L ;
SAARNIVAARA, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 57 (12) :1183-1187
[19]  
MARTIN TM, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P144
[20]   SHOULD THE ROUTINE USE OF ATROPINE BEFORE SUCCINYLCHOLINE IN CHILDREN BE RECONSIDERED [J].
MCAULIFFE, G ;
BISSONNETTE, B ;
BOUTIN, C .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (08) :724-729