A systematic review of the measurement properties of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32

被引:9
作者
Neijenhuijs, Koen I. [1 ,2 ]
Jansen, Femke [2 ,3 ]
Aaronson, Neil K. [4 ]
Bredart, Anne [5 ]
Groenvold, Mogens [6 ,7 ]
Holzner, Bernhard [8 ]
Terwee, Caroline B. [9 ]
Cuijpers, Pim [1 ]
Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Clin Neuro & Dev Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Psychosocial Res & Epidemiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Inst Curie, Psychooncol Unit, Paris, France
[6] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Palliat Med, Res Unit, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
[7] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Publ Hlth, Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Med Univ Innsbruck, CL Serv, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat, Innsbruck, Austria
[9] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Cancer; Patient satisfaction; Systematic review; Psychometry; Validity; Reliability; Patient-reported outcome measure; PROM; EORTC; IN-PATSAT32; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; APPLICATION ONCOKOMPAS; EHEALTH APPLICATION; COSMIN CHECKLIST; SELF-MANAGEMENT; SUPPORTIVE CARE; VALIDATION; SURVIVORS; VERSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-018-4243-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The EORTC IN-PATSAT32 is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to assess cancer patients' satisfaction with in-patient health care. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the initial good measurement properties of the IN-PATSAT32 are confirmed in new studies. Methods Within the scope of a larger systematic review study (Prospero ID 42017057237), a systematic search was performed of Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for studies that investigated measurement properties of the IN-PATSAT32 up to July 2017. Study quality was assessed, data were extracted, and synthesized according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. Results Nine studies were included in this review. The evidence on reliability and construct validity were rated as sufficient and of the quality of the evidence as moderate. The evidence on structural validity was rated as insufficient and of low quality. The evidence on internal consistency was indeterminate. Measurement error, responsiveness, criterion validity, and cross-cultural validity were not reported in the included studies. Measurement error could be calculated for two studies and was judged indeterminate. Conclusion In summary, the IN-PATSAT32 performs as expected with respect to reliability and construct validity. No firm conclusions can be made yet whether the IN-PATSAT32 also performs as well with respect to structural validity and internal consistency. Further research on these measurement properties of the PROM is therefore needed as well as on measurement error, responsiveness, criterion validity, and cross-cultural validity. For future studies, it is recommended to take the COSMIN methodology into account.
引用
收藏
页码:2551 / 2560
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Quality of life and satisfaction with care among palliative cancer patients in Saudi Arabia [J].
Aboshaiqah, Ahmad ;
Al-Saedi, Turki Suwaylim B. ;
Abu-Al-Ruyhaylah, Mohammed Munawir M. ;
Aloufi, Abdulrahman Abed ;
Alharbi, Muteb Omtairan ;
Alharbi, Saad Saud R. ;
Al-Saedi, Ahmad Salem ;
Al-Erwi, Abdulrahman Fahd .
PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2016, 14 (06) :621-627
[2]   Validation study of the EORTC information questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-INFO25) in Iranian cancer patients [J].
Asadi-lari, Mohsen ;
Pishkuhi, Mahin Ahmadi ;
Almasi-Hashiani, Amir ;
Safiri, Saeid ;
Sepidarkish, Mahdi .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (07) :1875-1882
[3]  
BAKER R, 1990, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V40, P487
[4]   A 12 country field study of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the head and neck cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) in head and neck patients [J].
Bjordal, K ;
de Graeff, A ;
Fayers, PM ;
Hammerlid, E ;
van Pottelsberghe, C ;
Curran, D ;
Ahlner-Elmqvist, M ;
Maher, EJ ;
Meyza, JW ;
Brédart, A ;
Söderholm, AL ;
Arraras, JJ ;
Feine, JS ;
Abendstein, H ;
Morton, RP ;
Pignon, T ;
Huguenin, P ;
Bottomly, A ;
Kaasa, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (14) :1796-1807
[5]   Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual [J].
Bland, J. Martin ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2007, 17 (04) :571-582
[6]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]   An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32) [J].
Brédart, A ;
Bottomley, A ;
Blazeby, JM ;
Conroy, T ;
Coens, C ;
D'Haese, S ;
Chie, WC ;
Hammerlid, E ;
Arraras, JI ;
Efficace, F ;
Rodary, C ;
Schraub, S ;
Costantini, M ;
Costantini, A ;
Joly, F ;
Sezer, O ;
Razavi, D ;
Mehlitz, M ;
Bielska-Lasota, M ;
Aaronson, NK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 41 (14) :2120-2131
[8]  
Bredart Anne, 2002, Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, V2, P597, DOI 10.1586/14737167.2.6.597
[9]   Measuring Patient Experience As A Strategy For Improving Primary Care [J].
Browne, Katherine ;
Roseman, Deborah ;
Shaller, Dale ;
Edgman-Levitan, Susan .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2010, 29 (05) :921-925
[10]   WHAT IS COEFFICIENT ALPHA - AN EXAMINATION OF THEORY AND APPLICATIONS [J].
CORTINA, JM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (01) :98-104