Fixed- or Controlled-Dose Mycophenolate Mofetil with Standard- or Reduced-Dose Calcineurin Inhibitors: The Opticept Trial

被引:146
作者
Gaston, R. [1 ]
Kaplan, B. [2 ]
Shah, T. [3 ]
Cibrik, D. [4 ]
Shaw, L. M. [5 ]
Angelis, M. [6 ]
Mulgaonkar, S. [7 ]
Meier-Kriesche, H. -U. [8 ]
Patel, D. [9 ]
Bloom, R. D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Natl Inst Transplantat, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Translife Florida Hosp, Orlando, FL USA
[7] St Barnabas Hosp, Livingston, NJ USA
[8] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
[9] Roche, Nutley, NJ USA
关键词
Calcineurin inhibitor; cyclosporine; mycophenolate mofetil; renal transplantation; tacrolimus; PHARMACOKINETIC-PHARMACODYNAMIC RELATIONSHIP; CHRONIC ALLOGRAFT NEPHROPATHY; RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; ACUTE REJECTION; ACID AREA; CYCLOSPORINE; EXPOSURE; CURVE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02668.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was developed with cyclosporine as a fixed-dose immunosuppressant. More recent data indicate a relationship between mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure in individuals and clinical endpoints of rejection and toxicity. This 2-year, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of concentration-controlled MMF (MMFCC) dosing with a fixed-dose regimen in 720 kidney recipients. Patients received either (A) MMFCC and reduced-level calcineurin inhibitor (MMFCC/CNIRL); (B) MMFCC and standard-level CNI (MMFCC/CNISL); or (C) fixed-dose MMF and CNISL (MMFFD/CNISL). Antibody induction and steroid use were according to center practice. The primary endpoint was noninferiority (alpha = 0.05) of group A versus group C for treatment failure (including biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss and death) at 1 year. Although mean CNI trough levels in group A did not reach the prespecified targets, they were statistically lower than those in groups B and C (p < 0.01 for each comparison). BPAR rates (8.5%) were low across groups. Group A had 19% fewer treatment failures (23% vs. 28%, p = 0.18). MMF doses were highest (p < 0.05), with withdrawals for adverse events the fewest (p = 0.02), in group A. Of the 80% of subjects taking tacrolimus (Tac), those with higher MPA exposure had significantly less rejection (p < 0.001) and diarrhea correlated with Tac, but not with MPA levels. Thus, MMFCC with low-dose CNI resulted in outcomes not inferior to those with standard CNI exposure and MMFFD, indicating potential utility of MMFCC in CNI-sparing regimens.
引用
收藏
页码:1607 / 1619
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Mycophenolic acid concentrations are associated with cardiac allograft rejection [J].
DeNofrio, D ;
Loh, E ;
Kao, A ;
Korecka, M ;
Pickering, FW ;
Craig, KA ;
Shaw, LM .
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 19 (11) :1071-1076
[2]   Influence of cyclosporine on the serum concentration and biliary excretion of mycophenolic acid and 7-O-mycophenolic acid glucuronide [J].
Deters, M ;
Kirchner, G ;
Koal, T ;
Resch, K ;
Kaever, V .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2005, 27 (02) :132-138
[3]   Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation [J].
Ekberg, Henrik ;
Tedesco-Silva, Helio ;
Demirbas, Alper ;
Vitko, Stefan ;
Nashan, Bjorn ;
Guerkan, Alp ;
Margreiter, Raimund ;
Hugo, Christian ;
Grinyo, Josep M. ;
Frei, Ulrich ;
Vanrenterghem, Yves ;
Daloze, Pierre ;
Halloran, Philip F. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (25) :2562-2575
[4]   Kidney transplantation without calcineurin inhibitor drugs: A prospective, randomized trial of sirolimus versus cyclosporin [J].
Flechner, SM ;
Goldfarb, D ;
Modlin, C ;
Feng, JY ;
Krishnamurthi, V ;
Mastroianni, B ;
Savas, K ;
Cook, DJ ;
Novick, AC .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (08) :1070-1076
[5]  
GRINYO J, 1995, LANCET, V345, P1321
[6]   The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation [J].
Hale, MD ;
Nicholls, AJ ;
Bullingham, RES ;
Hené, R ;
Hoitsma, A ;
Squifflet, JP ;
Weimar, W ;
Vanrenterghem, Y ;
Van de Woude, FJ ;
Verpooten, GA .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 64 (06) :672-683
[7]  
Keown P, 1996, TRANSPLANTATION, V61, P1029
[8]   Toxicity-sparing protocols using mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation [J].
Land, W ;
Vincenti, F .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 80 (02) :S221-S234
[9]   Simultaneous estimation of cyclosporin and mycophenolic acid areas under the curve in stable renal transplant patients using a limited sampling strategy [J].
Le Guellec, C ;
Büchler, M ;
Giraudeau, B ;
Le Meur, Y ;
Gakoué, JE ;
Lebranchu, Y ;
Marquet, P ;
Paintaud, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 57 (11) :805-811
[10]   Individualized mycophenolate mofetil dosing based on drug exposure significantly improves patient outcomes after renal transplantation [J].
Le Meur, Y. ;
Buechler, M. ;
Thierry, A. ;
Caillard, S. ;
Villemain, F. ;
Lavaud, S. ;
Etienne, I. ;
Westeel, P.-F. ;
de Ligny, B. H. ;
Rostaing, L. ;
Thervet, E. ;
Szelag, J. C. ;
Rerolle, J.-P. ;
Rousseau, A. ;
Touchard, G. ;
Marquet, P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (11) :2496-2503