Insights into Practitioner Design Science Research

被引:2
作者
Nagle, Tadhg [1 ]
Sammon, David [1 ]
Doyle, Cathal [2 ]
机构
[1] Cork Univ, Business Sch, Cork, Ireland
[2] Victoria Univ Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
来源
DESIGNING THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION, DESRIST 2017 | 2017年 / 10243卷
关键词
Practitioner research; Design science research; PDSR canvas; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS RESEARCH;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-59144-5_25
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Building on two previous papers that focused on the concept of Practitioner Design Science Research [1, 2], this paper: (i) presents the Practitioners Design Science Research (PDSR) Canvas, a visual guide for practitioners undertaking DSR, and (ii) utilises it as a lens to analyse the insights of 48 practitioners on their DSR journey. Data is primarily gathered from 48 practitioners, of which, 34 have completed a 12-month Design Science Research study, with the other 14 in the final stages of their journey. This unique practitioner perspective further develops the novel concept of PDSR which enables practitioners to engage with the academic community and not the other way around. Key findings show that practitioners have challenges with the practical (relevance) aspects of DSR as well as the research (rigour) aspects. Nonetheless, the analysis indicates that with a clear depiction of DSR, the gap between practice and research may not be as difficult to bridge as previously thought. However, this requires the IS community to rethink their definition of engaged scholarship from one that solely focuses on the academic as the researcher to one that also includes the practitioner.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 428
页数:15
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, QUALITATIVE RES BUSI
[2]   Action research [J].
Avison, D ;
Lau, F ;
Myers, M ;
Nielsen, PA .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1999, 42 (01) :94-97
[3]  
Baskerville R., 1999, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, V19
[4]   What design science is not [J].
Baskerville, Richard .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2008, 17 (05) :441-443
[5]   Principles of canonical action research [J].
Davison, R ;
Martinsons, MG ;
Kock, N .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2004, 14 (01) :65-86
[6]  
Desouza KC, 2006, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V17, P341
[7]  
Goes P.B., 2014, MIS QUART, V38, piii, DOI DOI 10.5555/2685139.2685140
[8]  
Goldkuhl Goran, 2012, Australasian Journal of Information Systems, V17, P57
[9]   Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research [J].
Goldkuhl, Goran .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 21 (02) :135-146
[10]   POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT [J].
Gregor, Shirley ;
Hevner, Alan R. .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2013, 37 (02) :337-+