Use of the reverse shock index for identifying high-risk patients in a five-level triage system

被引:24
作者
Chuang, Jung-Fang [1 ,2 ]
Rau, Cheng-Shyuan [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Shao-Chun [2 ,4 ]
Liu, Hang-Tsung [1 ,2 ]
Hsu, Shiun-Yuan [1 ,2 ]
Hsieh, Hsiao-Yun [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yi-Chun [1 ,2 ]
Hsieh, Ching-Hua [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Trauma Surg, 123 Ta Pei Rd, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, 123 Ta Pei Rd, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
[4] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
关键词
Reverse shock index (RSI); Shock; Injury severity score (ISS); Mortality; Five-level triage system; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; TRAUMA PATIENTS; TAIWAN TRIAGE; ACUITY SCALE; MAJOR TRAUMA; VITAL SIGNS; MORTALITY; INJURY; CORRELATE; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13049-016-0208-5
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: The ratio of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to heart rate (HR), called the reverse shock index (RSI), is used to evaluate the hemodynamic stability of trauma patients. To minimize undertriage in emergency departments (EDs), we evaluated whether RSI < 1 (i.e., SBP lower than HR) could be used as an additional variable to identify patients at high risk for more severe injury within a level category of the five-level Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scales (TTAS) system. Methods: Data obtained from the Trauma Registry System, including triage level according to the TTAS system, were retrospectively reviewed for trauma admissions from January 2009 through December 2013 in a Level I trauma center. In our study, the primary outcomes were injury severity as measured using different scoring systems, including the Glasgow coma scale (GCS), abbreviated injury scale scores, and the injury severity score (ISS), and in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). Results: Of 10,814 trauma patients, 348 patients (3.2 %) had RSI < 1, whereas 10,466 (96.8 %) had RSI >= 1. Those with RSI < 1 had greater injury severity, a higher incidence of commonly associated injuries, lower GCS scores, greater deterioration of vital signs, and a higher incidence of procedures those with RSI >= 1. Patients with RSI < 1 also worse outcomes including hospital and ICU LOS, a greater frequency of ICU admission, and higher in-hospital mortality. Although the five-level TTAS system provides good prioritization of patients with major trauma, using the additional criterion of RSI < 1 could identify the patients at higher risk within the same triage level (I-III). Discussion: The alert of a trauma patient's SBP being lower than his/her HR (RSI < 1) without the requirement of any additional equipment makes the concept of RSI particularly valuable in crowded EDs for identifying high-risk patients. RSI < 1 may serve as a principle trigger for action in the ED to alert trauma surgeons to the need for early intervention and timely preparation upon patient arrival particularly for those patients triaged in levels II and III of the TTAS system. Conclusions: RSI < 1 upon arrival at an ED is an alarming sign of an associated worse outcome. Within the same triage level from level I to level III, patients with RSI < 1 had worse outcomes than those with RSI = 1. The inclusion of RSI in the TTAS system may help to identify patients with more serious injuries who need an upgraded management level.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Shock index in diagnosing early acute hypovolemia [J].
Birkhahn, RH ;
Gaeta, TJ ;
Terry, D ;
Bove, JJ ;
Tloczkowski, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 23 (03) :323-326
[2]   Heart rate: Is it truly a vital sign? [J].
Brasel, Karen J. ;
Guse, Clare ;
Gentilello, Larry M. ;
Nirula, Ram .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 62 (04) :812-817
[3]   The value of traditional vital signs, shock index, and age-based markers in predicting trauma mortality [J].
Bruijns, Stevan R. ;
Guly, Henry R. ;
Bouamra, Omar ;
Lecky, Fiona ;
Lee, Wallis A. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2013, 74 (06) :1432-1437
[4]   Utility of the Shock Index in Predicting Mortality in Traumatically Injured Patients [J].
Cannon, Chad M. ;
Braxton, Carla C. ;
Kling-Smith, Mendy ;
Mahnken, Jonathan D. ;
Carlton, Elizabeth ;
Moncure, Michael .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 67 (06) :1426-1430
[5]   Effectiveness of a five-level Paediatric Triage System: an analysis of resource utilisation in the emergency department in Taiwan [J].
Chang, Yu-Che ;
Ng, Chip-Jin ;
Wu, Chang-Teng ;
Chen, Li-Chin ;
Chen, Jih-Chang ;
Hsu, Kuang-Hung .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2013, 30 (09) :735-739
[6]   EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT TRIAGE: DO EXPERIENCED NURSES AGREE ON TRIAGE SCORES? [J].
Dallaire, Clemence ;
Poitras, Julien ;
Aubin, Karine ;
Lavoie, Andre ;
Moore, Lynne .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 42 (06) :736-740
[7]   Application of the shock index to the prediction of need for hemostasis intervention [J].
DeMuro, Jonas P. ;
Simmons, Susan ;
Jax, Judy ;
Gianelli, Scott M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 31 (08) :1260-1263
[8]   Clinical review: Hemorrhagic shock [J].
Gutierrez, G ;
Reines, HD ;
Wolf-Gutierrez, ME .
CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 8 (05) :373-381
[9]   Mechanism of Injury Predicts Patient Mortality and Impairment After Blunt Trauma [J].
Haider, Adil H. ;
Chang, David C. ;
Haut, Elliott R. ;
Cornwell, Edward E., III ;
Efron, David T. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 153 (01) :138-142
[10]   Shock index as a marker for significant injury in trauma patients [J].
King, RW ;
Plewa, MC ;
Buderer, NMF ;
Knotts, FB .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1996, 3 (11) :1041-1045