Sentence planning following traumatic brain injury

被引:23
作者
Ellis, Charles [1 ]
Peach, Richard K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Coll Hlth Profess, Dept Rehabil Sci, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Language; cognition; confusion; pauses; Rancho Levels; verbal initiation; DISCOURSE ABILITIES; ADULTS; DEFICITS; CHILDREN; MEMORY;
D O I
10.3233/NRE-2009-0476
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Current descriptions of the language problems following traumatic brain injury (TBI) generally emphasize evaluating discourse production and explaining the observed outcomes in terms of disruptions to executive processes. The notion of sentence production impairments at the sentence level has generally been ignored. To respond to this issue, we examined patterns of intrasentential pausing and sentence planning during sentences produced by normal and TBI speakers. Methods: Seven individuals with TBI functioning at Rancho Level V-VI and seven age-matched controls participated in this pilot experiment. Group performances were compared for pause time and verbal initiation time during the production of sentences varying in syntactic complexity under two conditions (reading and repetition). Results: Significant group differences were observed in pausing during both conditions. Pausing patterns of the participants with TBI were strongly correlated with the syntactic complexity of sentences. No significant group differences were observed on verbal initiation time of repeated sentences, although increased initiation times were present among the TBI participants. Conclusions: These findings of this pilot project suggest that the deficits in language production following TBI may include specific impairments to sentence planning. This evidence suggests that the language profile of TBI may be one of both microlinguistic and macrolinguistic impairments.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 266
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Body R., 1999, COMMUNICATION DISORD, P81
[2]   Watching the eyes when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning [J].
Brown-Schmidt, S ;
Tanenhaus, MK .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2006, 54 (04) :592-609
[3]   SPEAKING RATE, ARTICULATORY SPEED, AND LINGUISTIC PROCESSING IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH SEVERE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY [J].
CAMPBELL, TF ;
DOLLAGHAN, CA .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1995, 38 (04) :864-875
[4]  
Caplan D., 1987, Neurolinguistics and linguistic aphasiology: an introduction
[5]   Effects of memory impairment on-discourse [J].
Caspari, I ;
Parkinson, SR .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLINGUISTICS, 2000, 13 (01) :15-36
[6]  
Coelho C.A., 2007, Brain Injury Medicine, P895
[7]   IMPAIRMENTS OF DISCOURSE ABILITIES AND EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS IN TRAUMATICALLY BRAIN-INJURED ADULTS [J].
COELHO, CA ;
LILES, BZ ;
DUFFY, RJ .
BRAIN INJURY, 1995, 9 (05) :471-477
[8]   Microlinguistic deficits in the narrative discourse of adults with traumatic brain injury [J].
Coelho, CA ;
Grela, B ;
Corso, M ;
Gamble, A ;
Feinn, R .
BRAIN INJURY, 2005, 19 (13) :1139-1145
[9]  
COELHO CA, 1991, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V72, P465
[10]   Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: Influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning [J].
Coelho, CA .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2002, 45 (06) :1232-1248