Risk attitudes, randomization to treatment, and self-selection into experiments

被引:93
作者
Harrison, Glenn W. [1 ]
Lau, Morten I. [2 ]
Rutstroem, E. Elisabet [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Coll Business Adm, Dept Econ, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Newcastle, Dept Econ, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Risk aversion; Randomization; Sample selection; Experiments; SAMPLE SELECTION; FIELD EXPERIMENTS; TIME-PREFERENCES; ELICITING RISK; MODELS; DENMARK; ENTRY; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2008.02.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Randomization to treatment is fundamental to statistical control in the design of experiments. However randomization implies some uncertainty about treatment condition. and individuals differ in their preferences towards taking on risk. Since human subjects often volunteer for experiments or are allowed to drop out of the experiment at any time if they want to, it is possible that the sample observed in an experiment might be biased because of the risk of randomization. On the other hand, the widespread use of a guaranteed show-up fee that is non-stochastic may generate sample selection biases of the opposite direction, encouraging more risk averse samples into experiments. We directly test these hypotheses that risk attitudes play a role in sample selection. Our results suggest that randomization bias does affect the overall level of risk aversion in the sample we observe. but that it does not affect the demographic mix of risk attitudes in the sample. We show that the common use of non-stochastic show-up fees can generate samples that are more risk averse than would otherwise have been observed. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 507
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Lost in state space: Are preferences stable? [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten I. ;
Rutstroem, E. Elisabet .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 49 (03) :1091-1112
[2]   Eliciting risk and time preferences [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten I. ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
ECONOMETRICA, 2008, 76 (03) :583-618
[3]   Elicitation using multiple price list formats (vol 9, pg 383, 2006) [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten Igel ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (01) :99-100
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, STAT STAT SOFTW REL
[5]   Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach [J].
Camerer, C ;
Lovallo, D .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (01) :306-318
[6]   Nonparametric estimation of sample selection models [J].
Das, M ;
Newey, WK ;
Vella, F .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2003, 70 (01) :33-58
[7]  
Harrison G.W., 2005, Applied Financial Economics Letters, V1, P31, DOI [10.1080/1744654042000311576, DOI 10.1080/1744654042000311576]
[8]   Estimating risk attitudes in Denmark:: A field experiment [J].
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten I. ;
Rutstroem, E. Elisabet .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2007, 109 (02) :341-368
[9]  
Harrison GW, 2008, RES EXP ECON, V12, P41, DOI 10.1016/S0193-2306(08)00003-3
[10]  
Harrison GW, 2005, RES EXP ECO, V10, P125