Segmental and suprasegmental errors in Spanish learning cochlear implant users: Neurolinguistic interpretation

被引:10
作者
Moreno-Torres, Ignacio [1 ]
Moruno-Lopez, Esther [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaga, Dept Spanish Language 2, E-29071 Malaga, Spain
关键词
Cochlear implants; Phonological development; Motor control; Consonants; Syllables; SPEAKING CHILDREN; PRODUCTION ACCURACY; VOCAL DEVELOPMENT; NORMAL-HEARING; WORD POSITION; ACOUSTIC CUES; SPEECH; LANGUAGE; ACQUISITION; RECIPIENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.04.002
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This study aims at investigating the impact of cochlear implant (CI) use for phonological development. The main participants were a group of 14 deaf children who had received their CIs in the second year of life, and who had been wearing them for 24 months. A group of normally hearing (NH) children aged 24 months old was also evaluated. Data was obtained from a non-word repetition (NWR) task. Various segmental and suprasegmental measures were obtained from the NWR data. The Cl children scored significantly below the controls for one feature (i.e. place of articulation) and for segment substitutions. Suprasegmental analyses revealed that the Cl children made fewer errors with unfooted syllables and more stress errors than the NH children. Stress errors were correlated with segmental/feature errors in the Cl children exclusively. We conclude that Cl users struggle to acquire consonants, which may cascade into further prosodic deficits. The results are interpreted in terms of a motor control model of speech production. We suggest that CIs provide sufficient information to learn rudimentary auditory representations for syllables; however, such auditory representations might not be detailed enough to implicitly derive the somatosensory consequences of the individual consonants. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Consonant-free words: Evidence from Hebrew speaking children with cochlear implants [J].
Adi-Bensaid, Limor ;
Tubul-Lavy, Gila .
CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2009, 23 (02) :122-132
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, WORKING MEMORY THOUG, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198528012.001.0001
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, THESIS U AMSTERDAM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOS
[5]   Cochlear implants in children - A review [J].
Balkany, TJ ;
Hodges, AV ;
Eshraghi, AA ;
Butts, S ;
Bricker, K ;
Lingvai, J ;
Polak, M ;
King, J .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2002, 122 (04) :356-362
[6]  
Boersma P., 2010, PRATT DOING PHONETIC
[7]   Production of consonants by prelinguistically deaf children with cochlear implants [J].
Bouchard, Marie-Eve Gaul ;
Le Normand, Marie-Therese ;
Cohen, Henri .
CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2007, 21 (11-12) :875-884
[8]   Perception of Speech Features by French-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants [J].
Bouton, Sophie ;
Serniclaes, Willy ;
Bertoncini, Josiane ;
Cole, Pascale .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2012, 55 (01) :139-153
[9]   Imitation of nonwords by hearing impaired children with cochlear implants: suprasegmental analyses [J].
Carter, AK ;
Dillon, CM ;
Pisoni, DB .
CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2002, 16 (08) :619-638
[10]   Cochlear Implant in the Second Year of Life: Lexical and Grammatical Outcomes [J].
Caselli, Maria Cristina ;
Rinaldi, Pasquale ;
Varuzza, Cristiana ;
Giuliani, Anna ;
Burdo, Sandro .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2012, 55 (02) :382-394