Different combinations of atomic interactions predict protein-small molecule and protein-DNA/RNA affinities with similar accuracy

被引:13
作者
Dias, Raquel [1 ]
Kolazckowski, Bryan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Microbiol & Cell Sci, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
binding affinity; intermolecular interactions; scoring functions; molecular docking; intermolecular specificity; protein-DNA; RNA; protein-protein; protein-small molecule; statistical binding prediction; EMPIRICAL SCORING FUNCTIONS; WEB-ACCESSIBLE DATABASE; GLOBAL REGULATOR CSRA; BINDING-AFFINITY; MODEL SELECTION; DOCKING; ENERGY; HYL1; PDB; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1002/prot.24928
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Interactions between proteins and other molecules play essential roles in all biological processes. Although it is widely held that a protein's ligand specificity is determined primarily by its three-dimensional structure, the general principles by which structure determines ligand binding remain poorly understood. Here we use statistical analyses of a large number of protein-ligand complexes with associated binding-affinity measurements to quantitatively characterize how combinations of atomic interactions contribute to ligand affinity. We find that there are significant differences in how atomic interactions determine ligand affinity for proteins that bind small chemical ligands, those that bind DNA/RNA and those that interact with other proteins. Although protein-small molecule and protein-DNA/RNA binding affinities can be accurately predicted from structural data, models predicting one type of interaction perform poorly on the others. Additionally, the particular combinations of atomic interactions required to predict binding affinity differed between small-molecule and DNA/RNA data sets, consistent with the conclusion that the structural bases determining ligand affinity differ among interaction types. In contrast to what we observed for small-molecule and DNA/RNA interactions, no statistical models were capable of predicting protein-protein affinity with >60% correlation. We demonstrate the potential usefulness of protein-DNA/RNA binding prediction as a possible tool for high-throughput virtual screening to guide laboratory investigations, suggesting that quantitative characterization of diverse molecular interactions may have practical applications as well as fundamentally advancing our understanding of how molecular structure translates into function. Proteins 2015; 83:2100-2114. (c) 2015 The Authors. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:2100 / 2114
页数:15
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   BASIC LOCAL ALIGNMENT SEARCH TOOL [J].
ALTSCHUL, SF ;
GISH, W ;
MILLER, W ;
MYERS, EW ;
LIPMAN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1990, 215 (03) :403-410
[2]   AIC MODEL SELECTION IN OVERDISPERSED CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA [J].
ANDERSON, DR ;
BURNHAM, KP ;
WHITE, GC .
ECOLOGY, 1994, 75 (06) :1780-1793
[3]   Toward an online repository of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for (Meta) genomic annotation [J].
Angiuoli, Samuel V. ;
Gussman, Aaron ;
Klimke, William ;
Cochrane, Guy ;
Field, Dawn ;
Garrity, George ;
Kodira, Chinnappa D. ;
Kyrpides, Nikos ;
Madupu, Ramana ;
Markowitz, Victor ;
Tatusova, Tatiana ;
Thomson, Nick ;
White, Owen .
OMICS-A JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY, 2008, 12 (02) :137-141
[4]   Small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions: Progressing towards the dream [J].
Arkin, MR ;
Wells, JA .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2004, 3 (04) :301-317
[5]   BgN-Score and BsN-Score: Bagging and boosting based ensemble neural networks scoring functions for accurate binding affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes [J].
Ashtawy, Hossam M. ;
Mahapatra, Nihar R. .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 16
[6]   A Comparative Assessment of Ranking Accuracies of Conventional and Machine-Learning-Based Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction [J].
Ashtawy, Hossam M. ;
Mahapatra, Nihar R. .
IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2012, 9 (05) :1301-1313
[7]   Functional mapping of the plant small RNA methyltransferase: HEN1 physically interacts with HYL1 and DICER-LIKE 1 proteins [J].
Baranauske, Simona ;
Mickute, Milda ;
Plotnikova, Alexandra ;
Finke, Andreas ;
Venclovas, Ceslovas ;
Klimasauskas, Saulius ;
Vilkaitis, Giedrius .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2015, 43 (05) :2802-2812
[8]  
Bates D., 2010, LME4 MIXED EFFECTS M
[9]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[10]  
Berman HM, 1999, BIOPHYS J, V76, pA200