Magnetic field effects on particle beams and their implications for dose calculation in MR-guided particle therapy

被引:50
作者
Fuchs, Hermann [1 ,2 ]
Moser, Philipp [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Groeschl, Martin [3 ]
Georg, Dietmar [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna AKH, Dept Radiat Oncol, Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Christian Doppler Lab Med Radiat Res Radiat Oncol, Vienna, Austria
[3] Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Appl Phys, Vienna, Austria
[4] Med Univ Vienna AKH, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Vienna, Austria
关键词
carbon ion; characterization; ion beam therapy; magnetic field; MR; proton; PROTON THERAPY; FEASIBILITY; DEFLECTION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1002/mp.12105
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate and model effects of magnetic fields on proton and carbon ion beams for dose calculation. Methods: In a first step, Monte Carlo simulations using Gate 7.1/Geant4.10.0.p03 were performed for proton and carbon ion beams in magnetic fields ranging from 0 to 3 T. Initial particle energies ranged from 60 to 250 MeV (protons) and 120 to 400 MeV/u (carbon ions), respectively. The resulting dose distributions were analyzed focusing on beam deflection, dose deformation, as well as the impact of material heterogeneities. In a second step, a numerical algorithm was developed to calculate the lateral beam position. Using the Runge-Kutta method, an iterative solution of the relativistic Lorentz equation, corrected for the changing particle energy during penetration, was performed. For comparison, a gamma-index analysis was utilized, using a criteria of 2%/2 mm of the local maximum. Results: A tilt in the dose distribution within the Bragg peak area was observed, leading to non-negligible dose distribution changes. The magnitude was found to depend on the magnetic field strength as well as on the initial beam energy. Comparison of the 3 T dose distribution with non-B field (nominal) dose distributions, resulted in a gamma(mean) (mean value of the gamma distribution) of 0.6, with 14.4% of the values above 1 and gamma(1)% (1% of all points have an equal or higher gamma value) of 1.8. The presented numerical algorithm calculated the lateral beam offset with maximum errors of less than 2% with calculation times of less than 5 mu s. The impact of tissue interfaces on the proton dose distributions was found to be less than 2% for a dose voxel size of 1 x 1 x 1 mm(3). Conclusion: Non-negligible dose deformations at the Bragg peak area were identified for high initial energies and strong magnetic fields. A fast numerical algorithm based on the solution of the energy-corrected relativistic Lorentz equation was able to describe the beam path, taking into account the particle energy, magnetic field, and material. (C) 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:1149 / 1156
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] GEANT4-a simulation toolkit
    Agostinelli, S
    Allison, J
    Amako, K
    Apostolakis, J
    Araujo, H
    Arce, P
    Asai, M
    Axen, D
    Banerjee, S
    Barrand, G
    Behner, F
    Bellagamba, L
    Boudreau, J
    Broglia, L
    Brunengo, A
    Burkhardt, H
    Chauvie, S
    Chuma, J
    Chytracek, R
    Cooperman, G
    Cosmo, G
    Degtyarenko, P
    Dell'Acqua, A
    Depaola, G
    Dietrich, D
    Enami, R
    Feliciello, A
    Ferguson, C
    Fesefeldt, H
    Folger, G
    Foppiano, F
    Forti, A
    Garelli, S
    Giani, S
    Giannitrapani, R
    Gibin, D
    Cadenas, JJG
    González, I
    Abril, GG
    Greeniaus, G
    Greiner, W
    Grichine, V
    Grossheim, A
    Guatelli, S
    Gumplinger, P
    Hamatsu, R
    Hashimoto, K
    Hasui, H
    Heikkinen, A
    Howard, A
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2003, 506 (03) : 250 - 303
  • [2] Andersen H., 1977, HYDROGEN STOPPING PO, V3
  • [3] ROOT - A C++ framework for petabyte data storage, statistical analysis and visualization
    Antcheva, I.
    Ballintijn, M.
    Bellenot, B.
    Biskup, M.
    Brun, R.
    Buncic, N.
    Canal, Ph.
    Casadei, D.
    Couet, O.
    Fine, V.
    Franco, L.
    Ganis, G.
    Gheata, A.
    Maline, D. Gonzalez
    Goto, M.
    Iwaszkiewicz, J.
    Kreshuk, A.
    Segura, D. Marcos
    Maunder, R.
    Moneta, L.
    Naumann, A.
    Offermann, E.
    Onuchin, V.
    Panacek, S.
    Rademakers, F.
    Russo, R.
    Tadel, M.
    [J]. COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 180 (12) : 2499 - 2512
  • [4] Apostolakis J., 2008, Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, IEEE, P833
  • [5] MedAustron-Project overview and status
    Benedikt, M.
    Wrulich, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2011, 126 (07): : 1 - 11
  • [6] Berger MJ, 1992, TECHNICAL REPORT
  • [7] Implementation of spot scanning dose optimization and dose calculation for helium ions in Hyperion
    Fuchs, Hermann
    Alber, Markus
    Schreiner, Thomas
    Georg, Dietmar
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (09) : 5157 - 5166
  • [8] A pencil beam algorithm for helium ion beam therapy
    Fuchs, Hermann
    Stroebele, Julia
    Schreiner, Thomas
    Hirtl, Albert
    Georg, Dietmar
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (11) : 6726 - 6737
  • [9] Geant4 collaboration, 2016, PHYS VAL VER
  • [10] Geant4 collaboration, PHYS LISTS US CAS RE