Kant and Hegel on Enlightenment

被引：0

作者：

Belas, Lubomir ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Inst Filozofie Etiky FF PU, Presov 08078, SR, Slovakia

来源：

FILOZOFIA | 2009年 / 64卷 / 06期

关键词：

Reason; Enlightenment; Non sui juris; Belief; Prejudices; Spirit's activity; Realization of reason; Usefulness; Absolute freedom;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

The paper focuses on the Enlightenment as an important object of the German tradition of philosophical-cultural researches and debates. It starts with an analysis of Kant's model of Aufklarung, underlining its social dimension. In Hegel's conception of the Enlightenment, the problem is approached critically and included in the process of the phenomenological-philosophical-historical development of mind. Hegel, unlike Kant, is historicizing, and thus narrowing the term of the enlightenment itself. In conclusion the author asks the question: Is it reasonable to see the real nature of the Enlightenment only in its fighting against mistakes, superstitions and prejudices?

引用

页码：584 / 591

页数：8

共 20 条

[1]

[Anonymous], NACHWORT

[2]

BAL A, 2006, VERNUNFT AUFKLARUNG, P179

[3]

BELAS L, 2007, CLOVEK DEJINY KULTUR, P104

[4]

Benner Dietrich, 2007, URTEILSKRAFT PADAGOG, P31

[5]

CASSIRER E, 1994, K LEBEN LEHRE

[6]

Cassirer Ernst, 1973, Die Philosophie der Aufklarung, V3rd

[7]

Deligiori Katharina., 2005, Kant and the Culture of Enlightenment Albany

[8]

FOUCAULT M, 1993, FILOS CAS, V41, P381

[9]

HABERMAS J, 2002, STRUKTURALNI PREMENA

[10]

HASLER L, 1982, STUDIA PHILOS, V41, P115

← 1 2 →