An evaluation of virus removal mechanisms by ultrafiltration membranes using MS2 and φX174 bacteriophage

被引:71
作者
ElHadidy, Ahmed M. [1 ]
Peldszus, Sigrid [1 ]
Van Dyke, Michele I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, NSERC Chair Water Treatment, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Bacteriophage; Adsorption; Electrostatic repulsion; Size exclusion model; Ultrafiltration membrane; PRESSURE; FILTRATION; EFFICIENCY; TRANSPORT; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.seppur.2013.09.026
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Low pressure membranes are a widely used drinking water treatment technology to reject particles and microbiological contaminants. A commercial UF membrane was used to investigate the removal of two virus surrogates (MS2 and phi X174 bacteriophage) of similar size but with different surface characteristics. MS2 was better removed than (phi X174 regardless of its smaller size. phi X174 removal was found to decrease significantly as the feed solution pH increased from 6.5 to 9.4. Using mathematical modeling, size exclusion was confirmed to be the main removal mechanism for both bacteriophage. These values were then compared with experimental results and virus characteristics to evaluate the contribution of other removal mechanisms. The additional removal for MS2 above baseline size exclusion was likely a result of electrostatic repulsion. For phi X174, adsorption was shown to increase rejection at pH 6.5, but at pH 9.4 removal was due solely to size exclusion. The higher isolectric point of phi X174, along with its complex capsid structure, are believed to be responsible for the different removal patterns between the two phage types. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 223
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Aach H., 1963, BIOLOGIE, V18, P290
[2]   Influence of design and operating conditions on the removal of MS2 bacteriophage by pilot-scale multistage slow sand filtration [J].
Anderson, William B. ;
DeLoyde, Jeffrey L. ;
Van Dyke, Michele I. ;
Huck, Peter M. .
JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2009, 58 (07) :450-462
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, 107051 ISO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, STANDARD METHODS EXA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Synthetic Membranes and Membrane Separation Processes
[6]   Effect of transmembrane pressure on rejection of viruses by ultrafiltration membranes [J].
Arkhangelsky, Elizabeth ;
Gitis, Vitaly .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 62 (03) :619-628
[7]   Virus' (MS2, φX174, and Aichi) Attachment on Sand Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy and Their Transport through Sand Columns [J].
Attinti, Ramesh ;
Wei, Jie ;
Kniel, Kalmia ;
Sims, J. Thomas ;
Jin, Yan .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (07) :2426-2432
[8]  
AWWA (American Water Works Association), 2005, MICR ULTR MEMBR DRIN
[9]  
Bean C P, 1972, Membranes, V1, P1
[10]  
Bungay P.M., 1973, INT J MULTIPHAS FLOW, V1, P25, DOI DOI 10.1016/0301-9322(73)90003-7