Female genital mutilation in children presenting to a London safeguarding clinic: a case series

被引:18
作者
Hodes, Deborah [1 ]
Armitage, Alice [1 ]
Robinson, Kerry [2 ]
Creighton, Sarah M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp, 250 Euston Rd, London NW1 2PG, England
[2] Whittington Hosp, Dept Paediat, London N19 5NF, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/archdischild-2015-308243
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective To describe the presentation and management of children referred with suspected female genital mutilation (FGM) to a UK safeguarding clinic. Design and setting Case series of all children under 18 years of age referred with suspected FGM between June 2006 and May 2014. Main outcome measures These include indication for referral, demographic data, circumstances of FGM, medical symptoms, type of FGM, investigations and short-term outcome. Results Of the 47 girls referred, 27 (57%) had confirmed FGM. According to the WHO classification of genital findings, FGM type 1 was found in 2 girls, type 2 in 8 girls and type 4 in 11 girls. No type 3 FGM was seen. The circumstances of FGM were known in 17 cases, of which 12 (71%) were performed by a health professional or in a medical setting (medicalisation). Ten cases were potentially illegal, yet despite police involvement there have been no prosecutions. Conclusions This study is an important snapshot of FGM within the UK paediatric population. The most frequent genital finding was type 4 FGM with no tissue damage or minimal scarring. FGM was performed at a young age, with 15% reported under the age of 1 year. The study also demonstrated significant medicalisation of FGM, which matches recent trends in international data. Type 4 FGM performed in infancy is easily missed on examination and so vigilance in assessing children with suspected FGM is essential.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 216
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, An Update on WHO's Work on Female Genital Mutilation Progress Report
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, UN NEWS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Female Genital Mutilation/ Cutting: A Statistical Overview and Exploration of the Dynamics of Change
[4]   Female genital mutilation: what every paediatrician should know [J].
Creighton, Sarah M. ;
Hodes, Deborah .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2016, 101 (03) :267-271
[5]  
Dorkenoo E, 2006, FEMALE GENITAL MUTIL
[6]   Reliability of self reported form of female genital mutilation and WHO classification: cross sectional study [J].
Elmusharaf, Susan ;
Elhadi, Nagla ;
Almroth, Lars .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7559) :124-127
[7]  
FORWARD, 2012, RAIS VOIC CHANG ANN
[8]  
HM Government, 2014, MULT PRACT GUID FEM
[9]  
House of Commons Home Affairs Committee, 2014, FEM GEN MUT CAS NAT
[10]  
London Safeguarding Children Board, 2009, SAF CHILDR RISK AB F