Authentic leadership and psychological ownership: investigation of interrelations

被引:32
作者
Alok, Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Chandragupt Inst Management Patna, Patna, Bihar, India
关键词
Authentic leadership; Dyadic duration; Moderation effect; Psychological ownership; Territoriality; POSITIVE ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS; SELF; PERFORMANCE; ATTITUDES; WORK; NEED;
D O I
10.1108/LODJ-06-2012-0080
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - Authentic leadership and psychological ownership appear to be at somewhat similar stage of construct evolution. In the present study, the author asks two research questions: first, how authentic leadership relates to psychological ownership and second, how dyadic duration influences this relationship. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - Using correlational research design, the author collected cross-sectional data from 182 Indian professionals working in various organizations in India. The author used structural equation modeling to test the study hypotheses. Findings - The results showed that authentic leadership positively influenced organization-based promotive psychological ownership; however, it shared no relationship with preventive psychological ownership or territoriality. Relational transparency and self-awareness factorials of authentic leadership influenced belongingness and self-efficacy factorials of psychological ownership beyond what authentic leadership as the second-order factor could account for. Leader self-awareness negatively related to follower self-efficacy. Authentic leadership completely accounted for the effects of moral perspective and balanced processing factorials on psychological ownership. Dyadic duration was not found to have significant moderation effect. Research limitations/implications - Overall, the findings imply that authentic leadership may make followers dependent and allow less relational substitutability. Moral perspective may be more central to authentic leadership construct than self-awareness. Moreover, it may not be appropriate to consider territoriality as a part of psychological ownership construct. Originality/value - The author believes that it is the first study to investigate the factorial-level interrelations between authentic leadership and psychological ownership. It can help in advancing authentic leadership theory and refining psychological ownership construct.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 285
页数:20
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Alok K., 2012, The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, V47, P498
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, P ANN M SOC IND ORG
[3]   Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions [J].
Ashforth, Blake E. ;
Harrison, Spencer H. ;
Corley, Kevin G. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2008, 34 (03) :325-374
[4]   Psychological ownership: theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes [J].
Avey, James B. ;
Avolio, Bruce J. ;
Crossley, Craig D. ;
Luthans, Fred .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2009, 30 (02) :173-191
[5]   Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors [J].
Avolio, BJ ;
Gardner, WL ;
Walumbwa, FO ;
Luthans, F ;
May, DR .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2004, 15 (06) :801-823
[6]   Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions [J].
Avolio, Bruce J. ;
Walumbwa, Fred O. ;
Weber, Todd J. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 :421-449
[7]  
BANAJI MR, 1994, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V45, P297, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.45.1.297
[8]  
Bandura A., 1977, Social learning theory
[9]  
Bandura A., 2007, Encyclopedia of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, V2, P729
[10]  
Baumeister R., 1999, The Self in Social Psychology, P1