Globalised quests for assisted conception: Reproductive travel for infertility and involuntary childlessness

被引:19
作者
Whittaker, Andrea [1 ]
Inhorn, Marcia C. [2 ]
Shenfield, Francoise [3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Fac Arts, Sch Social Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Yale Univ, Anthropol & Int Affairs, Council Middle East Studies, MacMillan Ctr, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Univ Coll Hosp, Reprod Med Unit, EGA, London, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Reproductive travel; infertility; assisted reproductive technologies; cross border reproductive care; globalisation; HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS; COMMERCIAL SURROGACY; FERTILITY TOURISM; EGG DONATION; CARE; TECHNOLOGIES; EXPERIENCES; CHALLENGES; ETHICS; LEGAL;
D O I
10.1080/17441692.2019.1627479
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The global movement of people across international borders to undergo assisted reproductive treatment is common, although there is little accurate data. In this article, we synthesise findings from our own empirical research on reproductive travel in addition to a review of clinical, ethical, legal, and regulatory complexities from studies on reproductive travel since 2010. Motivations for travel include legal and religious prohibitions; resource considerations; lack of access to gametes and reproductive assistors; quality and safety concerns; and personal preferences. Higher risks to mothers and children are associated with multiple embryo transfer and subsequent multiple and higher order pregnancies and the average older age of women undertaking reproductive travel. The potential exploitation of other women as providers of oocytes or surrogacy services, the lack of equity in access to assisted reproduction and the ambiguous legal status of children conceived from international reproductive travel are important ethical considerations. A range of significant legal issues remain given variable and limited international regulation. Scholarship on this trade necessarily engages with issues of power and gender, social inequities, global capitalism and the private decision-making of individuals seeking to form families. Research gaps remain given recent changes in the organisation, demands and destinations of the trade.
引用
收藏
页码:1669 / 1688
页数:20
相关论文
共 137 条
  • [11] Birenbaum-Carmeli Daphna, 2016, Reprod Biomed Soc Online, V2, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.rbms.2016.05.004
  • [12] Reproductive tourism - a price worth paying for reproductive autonomy?
    Blyth, E
    Farrand, A
    [J]. CRITICAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2005, 25 (01) : 91 - 114
  • [13] CBRC and psychosocial counselling: assessing needs and developing an ethical framework for practice
    Blyth, Eric
    Thorn, Petra
    Wischmann, Tewes
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2011, 23 (05) : 642 - 651
  • [14] Bochow A., 2015, ASSISTED REPROD TECH, P135
  • [15] The Medical Tourist and a Political Economy of Care
    Bolton, Sharon
    Skountridaki, Lila
    [J]. ANTIPODE, 2017, 49 (02) : 499 - 516
  • [16] Cohen E, 2012, 2012 IEEE 12TH TOPICAL MEETING ON SILICON MONOLITHIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS IN RF SYSTEMS (SIRF), P207, DOI 10.1109/SiRF.2012.6160151
  • [17] Colen Shellee., 2009, Feminist Anthropology: A Reader, P380
  • [18] Cross-border reproductive care: now and into the future
    Collins, John
    Cook, Jocelynn
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (01) : E25 - E26
  • [19] Reducing the scale? From global images to border crossings in medical tourism
    Connell, John
    [J]. GLOBAL NETWORKS-A JOURNAL OF TRANSNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2016, 16 (04): : 531 - 550
  • [20] Cooper M., 2014, CLIN LABOR TISSUES D