Carbapenems versus alternative antibiotics for the treatment of bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacter, Citrobacter or Serratia species: a systematic review with meta-analysis

被引:62
作者
Harris, Patrick N. A. [1 ]
Wei, Jane Y. [2 ]
Shen, Andrew W. [2 ]
Abdile, Ahmed A. [3 ]
Paynter, Stuart [4 ]
Huxley, Rachel R. [4 ]
Pandeya, Nirmala [4 ]
Doi, Yohei [5 ]
Huh, Kyungmin [6 ]
O'Neal, Catherine S. [7 ]
Talbot, Thomas R. [8 ,9 ]
Paterson, David L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, UQ Ctr Clin Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Auckland, Sch Med, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Publ Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Infect Dis, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Armed Forces Capital Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Songnam, South Korea
[7] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Infect Dis, New Orleans, LA USA
[8] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[9] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Policy, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
关键词
AMPC BETA-LACTAMASE; GRAM-NEGATIVE BACILLI; TREATMENT OUTCOMES; CLINICAL-FEATURES; RISK-FACTORS; RESISTANCE; EMERGENCE; CEFEPIME; THERAPY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkv346
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
This systematic review and meta-analysis compared effects of different antibiotics on mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae with chromosomal AmpC beta-lactamase. Databases were systematically searched for studies reporting mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by AmpC producers treated with carbapenems, broad-spectrum beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs), quinolones or cefepime. Pooled ORs for mortality were calculated for cases that received monotherapy with these agents versus carbapenems. Registration: PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42014014992; 18 November 2014). Eleven observational studies were included. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting empirical and definitive monotherapy. In unadjusted analyses, no significant difference in mortality was found between BLBLIs versus carbapenems used for definitive therapy (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.32-2.36) or empirical therapy (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.14-1.60) or cefepime versus carbapenems as definitive therapy (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.27-1.38) or empirical therapy (0.60; 95% CI 0.17-2.20). Use of a fluoroquinolone as definitive therapy was associated with a lower risk of mortality compared with carbapenems (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.19-0.78). Three studies with patient-level data were used to adjust for potential confounders. The non-significant trends favouring non-carbapenem options in these studies were diminished after adjustment for age, sex and illness severity scores, suggestive of residual confounding. Despite limitations of available data, there was no strong evidence to suggest that BLBLIs, quinolones or cefepime were inferior to carbapenems. The reduced risk of mortality observed with quinolone use may reflect less serious illness in patients, rather than superiority over carbapenems.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 306
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ENT SEPS OUTC PROGR
  • [2] Emergence of Imipenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli in Intestinal Flora of Intensive Care Patients
    Armand-Lefevre, Laurence
    Angebault, Cecile
    Barbier, Francois
    Hamelet, Emilie
    Defrance, Gilles
    Ruppe, Etienne
    Bronchard, Regis
    Lepeule, Raphael
    Lucet, Jean-Christophe
    El Mniai, Assiya
    Wolff, Michel
    Montravers, Philippe
    Plesiat, Patrick
    Andremont, Antoine
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2013, 57 (03) : 1488 - 1495
  • [3] Clinical and microbiological characteristics of bloodstream infections due to AmpC β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae: an active surveillance cohort in a large centralized Canadian region
    Chaubey, Vikas P.
    Pitout, Johann D. D.
    Dalton, Bruce
    Gregson, Daniel B.
    Ross, Terry
    Laupland, Kevin B.
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 14
  • [4] Emergence of antibiotic resistance during therapy for infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae producing AmpC β-lactamase:: Implications for antibiotic use
    Choi, Sang-Ho
    Lee, Jung Eun
    Park, Su Jin
    Choi, Seong-Ho
    Lee, Sang-Oh
    Jeong, Jin-Yong
    Kim, Mi-Na
    Woo, Jun Hee
    Kim, Yang Soo
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2008, 52 (03) : 995 - 1000
  • [5] ENTEROBACTER BACTEREMIA - CLINICAL-FEATURES AND EMERGENCE OF ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE DURING THERAPY
    CHOW, JW
    FINE, MJ
    SHLAES, DM
    QUINN, JP
    HOOPER, DC
    JOHNSON, MP
    RAMPHAL, R
    WAGENER, MM
    MIYASHIRO, DK
    YU, VL
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 115 (08) : 585 - 590
  • [6] blaIMP-4 in different genetic contexts in Enterobacterzaceae isolates from Australia
    Espedido, Bjoern A.
    Partridge, Sally R.
    Iredell, Jonathan R.
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2008, 52 (08) : 2984 - 2987
  • [7] Overall burden of bloodstream infection and nosocomial bloodstream infection in North America and Europe
    Goto, M.
    Al-Hasan, M. N.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2013, 19 (06) : 501 - 509
  • [8] Antimicrobial susceptibility reporting and treatment selection for AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae: what do microbiologists and infectious disease practitioners actually practice?
    Harris, P. N. A.
    Alder, L.
    Paterson, D. L.
    [J]. PATHOLOGY, 2015, 47 (04) : 386 - 388
  • [9] Antibiotic therapy for inducible AmpC β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacilli: what are the alternatives to carbapenems, quinolones and aminoglycosides?
    Harris, P. N. A.
    Ferguson, J. K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2012, 40 (04) : 297 - 305
  • [10] Issues relating to study design and risk of bias when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Ramsay, Craig
    Reeves, Barnaby C.
    Deeks, Jonathan J.
    Shea, Beverley
    Valentine, Jeffrey C.
    Tugwellh, Peter
    Wellsi, George
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2013, 4 (01) : 12 - 25